ArticleBMJ open2024
Predicting pressure injury risk in hospitalised patients using machine learning with electronic health records: a US multilevel cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and other best practice recommendations for pressure injury risk assessment in the United States.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyPooled it
- Feasibility of Using Digital Clinical Records to Identify Factors Associated with Nursing-Sensitive Outcomes During Hospitalization: A Pilot Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Exploratory Analysis of Factors Associated With Pressure Injuries in Surgical Patients Assessed With the ELPO Scale.International journal of nursing practice · 2026Article
- Pressure Injury Risk Assessment in Nursing Practice: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Braden Scale and Machine Learning Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Profiles in Hospitalized Adults Based on Functional Capacity, Pressure Injury Risk, and Fall Risk: A Cluster and Multiple Correspondence Analysis.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026Observational
- Early prediction of pressure injury risk in hospitalized patients using supervised machine learning models based on nursing records.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Electronic-Medical-Record-Driven Machine Learning Predictive Model for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries: Development and External Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Transformative Insights into Community-Acquired Pressure Injuries Among the Elderly: A Big Data Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preventing pressure injuries in individuals with impaired mobility: Best practices and future directions.Journal of surgery and research · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing among various categories of professionals in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Enhancing clinical reliability in pressure injury prediction: A conformal prediction approach with machine learning models.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo predict the risk of hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning compared with standard care.
designWe obtained electronic health records (EHRs) to structure a multilevel cohort of hospitalised patients at risk for pressure injury and then calibrate a machine learning model to predict future pressure injury risk. Optimisation methods combined with multilevel logistic regression were used to develop a predictive algorithm of patient-specific shifts in risk over time. Machine learning methods were tested, including random forests, to identify predictive features for the algorithm. We reported the results of the regression approach as well as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for predictive models.
settingHospitalised inpatients.
participantsEHRs of 35 001 hospitalisations over 5 years across 2 academic hospitals.
main outcome measureLongitudinal shifts in pressure injury risk.
resultsThe predictive algorithm with features generated by machine learning achieved significantly improved prediction of pressure injury risk (p<0.001) with an area under the ROC curve of 0.72; whereas standard care only achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.52. At a specificity of 0.50, the predictive algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 0.75.
conclusionsThese data could help hospitals conserve resources within a critical period of patient vulnerability of hospital-acquired pressure injury which is not reimbursed by US Medicare; thus, conserving between 30 000 and 90 000 labour-hours per year in an average 500-bed hospital. Hospitals can use this predictive algorithm to initiate a quality improvement programme for pressure injury prevention and further customise the algorithm to patient-specific variation by facility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.