Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38593945›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2024

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Care-Part 2: Applications: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Sneha S Jain, Pierre Elias, Timothy Poterucha, Michael Randazzo, Francisco Lopez Jimenez, Rohan Khera, Marco Perez, David Ouyang, James Pirruccello, Michael Salerno and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autonomous Agents for Auditable Cardiovascular Artificial Intelligence Development.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sneha S JainDivision of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Pierre EliasSeymour, Paul and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Timothy PoteruchaSeymour, Paul and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael RandazzoDivision of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Francisco Lopez JimenezDepartment of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rohan KheraDivision of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Marco PerezDivision of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
David OuyangDivision of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
James PirruccelloDivision of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael SalernoDivision of Cardiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Andrew J EinsteinSeymour, Paul and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Robert AvramDivision of Cardiology, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Geoffrey H TisonDivision of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Girish NadkarniIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Vivek NatarajanGoogle Health, Mountain View, California, USA.
Emma PiersonDepartment of Computer Science, Cornell Tech, New York, New York, USA.
Ashley BeecyNewYork-Presbyterian Health System, New York, New York, USA; Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Deepa KumaraiahSeymour, Paul and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Health System, New York, New York, USA.
Chris HaggertyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; NewYork-Presbyterian Health System, New York, New York, USA.
Jennifer N Avari SilvaDivision of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Thomas M MaddoxDivision of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA. Electronic address: thomas.maddox@bjc.org.

Funding

The Rhythm Evaluation for Anticoagulation with Continuous Monitoring of Atrial Fibrillation Trial (REACT-AF)UG3HL165065 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PASSMAN, ROD S · 2022 to 2022
$3.6M
COVID and Translational Science supercomputer (CATS)S10OD030463 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Big Omics Data Engine 2 SupercomputerS10OD026880 · OD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KOVATCH, PATRICIA · 2019 to 2019
$2.0M
Deep learning to enable the genetic analysis of aortaK08HL159346 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PIRRUCCELLO, JAMES · 2021 to 2025
$827k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL159346NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL165065NIH HHS S10 OD026880NIH HHS S10 OD030463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent artificial intelligence (AI) advancements in cardiovascular care offer potential enhancements in effective diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. More than 600 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical AI algorithms now exist, with 10% focusing on cardiovascular applications, highlighting the growing opportunities for AI to augment care. This review discusses the latest advancements in the field of AI, with a particular focus on the utilization of multimodal inputs and the field of generative AI. Further discussions in this review involve an approach to understanding the larger context in which AI-augmented care may exist, and include a discussion of the need for rigorous evaluation, appropriate infrastructure for deployment, ethics and equity assessments, regulatory oversight, and viable business cases for deployment. Embracing this rapidly evolving technology while setting an appropriately high evaluation benchmark with careful and patient-centered implementation will be crucial for cardiology to leverage AI to enhance patient care and the provider experience.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiovascular DiseasesCardiologyHumansartificial intelligencecardiac imagingclinical trialsdeep learningdigital healthgenerative AIhealth equityimplementation scienceinnovationlarge language modelsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38593945
PMCPMC12215878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.