Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38593042›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2024

Cachexia index for prognostication in surgical patients with locally advanced oesophageal or gastric cancer: multicentre cohort study.

Leo R Brown, Georgina G Thomson, Ellen Gardner, Siobhan Chien, Josh McGovern, Ross D Dolan, Stephen T McSorley, Matthew J Forshaw, Donald C McMillan, Stephen J Wigmore and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leo R BrownClinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6181-7020
Georgina G ThomsonClinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ellen GardnerDepartment of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK.
Siobhan ChienCentre for Sustainable Delivery, Golden Jubilee Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Josh McGovernAcademic Unit of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Ross D DolanAcademic Unit of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Stephen T McSorleyAcademic Unit of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Matthew J ForshawDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Donald C McMillanAcademic Unit of Surgery, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Stephen J WigmoreClinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew B CrumleyDepartment of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK.
Richard J E SkipworthClinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-4078

Funding

Chief Scientist's Office NASANESNHS Research ScotlandRoyal College of Surgeons (Edinburgh)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeatures of cancer cachexia adversely influence patient outcomes, yet few currently inform clinical decision-making. This study assessed the value of the cachexia index (CXI), a novel prognostic marker, in patients for whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for oesophagogastric cancer is planned.

methodsConsecutive patients newly diagnosed with locally advanced (T3-4 or at least N1) oesophagogastric cancer between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 were identified through the West of Scotland and South-East Scotland Cancer Networks. CXI was calculated as (L3 skeletal muscle index) × (serum albumin)/(neutrophil lymphocyte ratio). Sex-stratified cut-off values were determined based on the area under the curve (AUC), and patients were divided into groups with low or normal CXI. Primary outcomes were disease progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival (at least 5 years of follow-up).

resultsOverall, 385 patients (72% men, median age 66 years) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal (274) or gastric (111) cancer across the study interval. Although patients with a low CXI (men: CXI below 52 (AUC 0.707); women: CXI below 41 (AUC 0.759)) were older with more co-morbidity, disease characteristics were comparable to those in patients with a normal CXI. Rates of disease progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, leading to inoperability, were higher in patients with a low CXI (28 versus 12%; adjusted OR 3.07, 95% c.i. 1.67 to 5.64; P < 0.001). Low CXI was associated with worsened postoperative mortality (P = 0.019) and decreased overall survival (median 14.9 versus 56.9 months; adjusted HR 1.85, 1.42 to 2.42; P < 0.001).

conclusionCXI is associated with disease progression, worse postoperative mortality, and overall survival, and could improve prognostication and decision-making in patients with locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer.

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsAgedCachexiaCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLymphocytesMalePrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38593042
PMCPMC11003541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.