Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592972›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Retrieval Practice and Word Learning by Children With Developmental Language Disorder: Does Expanding Retrieval Provide Additional Benefit?

Laurence B Leonard, Sharon L Christ, Patricia Deevy, Jeffrey Karpicke, Justin B Kueser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurence B LeonardDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.ORCID 0000-0002-9189-4438
Sharon L ChristDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Patricia DeevyDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jeffrey KarpickeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Justin B KueserDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.ORCID 0000-0002-1619-5274
Google (United States) · US

Funding

Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Specific Language ImpairmentR01DC014708 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey Karpicke · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe word learning of preschool-age children with developmental language disorder (DLD) is improved when spaced retrieval practice is incorporated into the learning sessions. In this preregistered study, we compared two types of spacing-an expanding retrieval practice schedule and an equally spaced schedule-to determine if one of these approaches yields better word learning outcomes for the children.

methodFourteen children with DLD aged 4-5 years and 14 same-age children with typical language development (TD) learned eight novel nouns over two sessions. Spacing for half of the novel words was expanded gradually during learning; for the remaining novel words, greater spacing remained at the same level throughout learning. Immediately after the second session and 1 week later, the children's recall of the words was tested.

resultsThe children with TD recalled more novel words than the children with DLD, although this difference could be accounted for by differences in the children's standardized receptive vocabulary test scores. The two groups were similar in their ability to retain the words over 1 week. Initially, the shorter spacing in the expanding schedule resulted in greater retrieval success than the corresponding (longer spaced) retrieval trials in the equally spaced schedule. These early shorter spaced trials also seemed to benefit retrieval of the trials with greater spacing that immediately followed. However, as the learning period progressed, the accuracy levels for the two conditions converged and were likewise similar during final testing.

conclusionWe need a greater understanding of how and when short spacing can be helpful to children's word learning, with the recognition that early gains might give a misleading picture of the benefits that short spacing can provide to longer term retention. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.25537696.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersMental RecallVerbal LearningVocabularyChild LanguageChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMalePractice, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID38592972
PMCPMC11087082
OpenAlexW4394600713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.