Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592721›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Anti-EGFR Rechallenge in Patients With Refractory ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Davide Ciardiello, Erika Martinelli, Teresa Troiani, Gianluca Mauri, Daniele Rossini, Giulia Martini, Stefania Napolitano, Vincenzo Famiglietti, Sara Del Tufo, Gianluca Masi and 12 more

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02296203 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A phase ii single-arm study of cetuximab plus irinotecan as rechallenge 3rd-line treatment of kras, nras and braf wild-type irinotecan-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients progressing after an initial response to a 1st-line cetuximab-containing therapy and a standard 2nd-line

TypeinterventionalSponsorGruppo Oncologico del Nord-OvestRan2014 to 2018Enrolled27ConditionsMetastatic Colorectal CancerArmscetuximab, irinotecan
NCT03227926 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Trial of Rechallenge With Panitumumab Driven by RAS Clonal-mediated Dynamic of Resistance

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione del Piemonte per l'OncologiaRan2017 to 2021Enrolled32ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsPanitumumab 20 MG/ML Intravenous Solution [VECTIBIX], Molecular Screening
NCT04561336 phase2completednot on this map

CAVE (Cetuximab-AVElumab) mCRC: A Single Arm Phase II Clinical Study of the Combination of Avelumab Plus Cetuximab in Pre-treated RAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Campania Luigi VanvitelliRan2018 to 2021Enrolled77ConditionsMetastatic Colorectal Cancer, RAS Wild TypeArmsAvelumab, Cetuximab
NCT05468892 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Panitumumab (VEctibix ) and Trifluridine-Tipiracil (LOnsurf) in Pretreated RAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: the VELO Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Campania Luigi VanvitelliRan2019 to 2022Enrolled68ConditionsMetastatic Colon CancerArmsTrifluridine Tipiracil, Panitumumab 20 MG/1 ML Intravenous Solution [VECTIBIX]
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Liquid biopsy in modern medicine: advancing diagnostics from molecular insights to clinical practice.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Practical integration of ctDNA-defined minimal residual disease in gastrointestinal cancers: testing windows and evidence-aligned management frameworks.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Davide CiardielloDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Erika MartinelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Teresa TroianiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Gianluca MauriDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Daniele RossiniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giulia MartiniDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Stefania NapolitanoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo FamigliettiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Sara Del TufoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Gianluca MasiDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Daniele SantiniMedical Oncology Department, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonio AvalloneExperimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Filippo PietrantonioMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Sara LonardiIstituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Massimo Di MaioDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Maria Giulia ZampinoDivision of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Nicola FazioDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Alberto BardelliIFOM ETS-The AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore SienaDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Chiara CremoliniDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea Sartore-BianchiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIFOM · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The available evidence regarding anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor rechallenge in patients with refractory circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS/BRAF wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is derived from small retrospective and prospective studies. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-EGFR rechallenge in patients with refractory ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt mCRC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized controlled trial used a pooled analysis of individual patient data from patients with RAS/BRAF wt ctDNA mCRC enrolled in 4 Italian trials (CAVE, VELO, CRICKET, and CHRONOS) and treated with anti-EGFR rechallenge between 2015 and 2022 (median [IQR] follow-up, 28.1 [25.8-35.0] months). Intervention: Patients received anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy, including cetuximab plus avelumab, trifluridine-tipiracil plus panitumumab, irinotecan plus cetuximab, or panitumumab monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated. Exploratory subgroup analysis evaluating several clinical variables was performed. Safety was reported. Results: Overall, 114 patients with RAS/BRAF wt ctDNA mCRC (median [IQR] age, 61 [29-88] years; 66 men [57.9%]) who received anti-EGFR rechallenge as experimental therapy (48 received cetuximab plus avelumab, 26 received trifluridine-tipiracil plus panitumumab, 13 received irinotecan plus cetuximab, and 27 received panitumumab monotherapy) were included in the current analysis. Eighty-three patients (72.8%) had received 2 previous lines of therapy, and 31 patients (27.2%) had received 3 or more previous lines of therapy. The ORR was 17.5% (20 patients), and the DCR was 72.3% (82 patients). The median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.7 months), and the median OS was 13.1 months (95% CI, 9.5-16.7 months). The subgroup of patients without liver involvement had better clinical outcomes. The median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.8-6.7 months) in patients without liver metastasis compared with 3.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-3.9 months) in patients with liver metastasis (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.37-0.83; P = .004). The median OS was 17.7 months (95% CI, 13-22.4 months) in patients without liver metastasis compared with 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.3-13.9 months) in patients with liver metastasis (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.97; P = .04). Treatments showed manageable toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy has promising antitumor activity in patients with refractory ctDNA RAS/BRAF wt mCRC. Within the limitation of a subgroup analysis, the absence of liver metastases was associated with significant improved survival. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02296203; NCT04561336; NCT03227926; NCT05468892.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCetuximabErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedPanitumumabProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIrinotecanPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTrifluridine

Identifiers

PMID38592721
PMCPMC11004834
OpenAlexW4394602714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.