Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592696›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Success in Patients with Respiratory Failure, Including Those with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Tamar Stivi, Dan Padawer, Noor Dirini, Akiva Nachshon, Baruch M Batzofin, Stephane Ledot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamar StiviDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.
Dan PadawerDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2023-929X
Noor DiriniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.
Akiva NachshonDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.
Baruch M BatzofinDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.
Stephane LedotDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem, POB 12000, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of mechanical ventilation (MV) remains a challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). The digitalization of healthcare and the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has significantly influenced medical decision-making capabilities, potentially enhancing patient outcomes. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, an overwhelming inflammatory lung disease, is common in ICUs. Most patients require MV. Prolonged MV is associated with an increased length of stay, morbidity, and mortality. Shortening the MV duration has both clinical and economic benefits and emphasizes the need for better MV weaning management. AI and ML models can assist the physician in weaning patients from MV by providing predictive tools based on big data. Many ML models have been developed in recent years, dealing with this unmet need. Such models provide an important prediction regarding the success of the individual patient's MV weaning. Some AI models have shown a notable impact on clinical outcomes. However, there are challenges in integrating AI models into clinical practice due to the unfamiliar nature of AI for many physicians and the complexity of some AI models. Our review explores the evolution of weaning methods up to and including AI and ML as weaning aids.

Indexed as

acute respiratory distress syndromeartificial intelligencemachine learningmechanical ventilation weaningprediction models

Identifiers

PMID38592696
PMCPMC10934889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.