Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592656›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2024

An Innovation in Cancer Nursing Education Across Europe: A Pilot Evaluation.

Wendy McInally, Vanessa Taylor, Celia Diez de Los Rios de la Serna, Virpi Sulosaari, Eugenia Trigoso, Sara Margarida Rodrigues Gomes, Ana Rita Cesario Dias, Silvija Piskorjanac, Mary Anne Tanay, Halldóra Hálfdánardóttir and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wendy McInallySchool of Health, Wellbeing and Social Care, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. wendy.mcinally@open.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9900-4612
Vanessa TaylorSchool of Health and Human Sciences, University of Huddersfield, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4117-4675
Celia Diez de Los Rios de la SernaPhD Programme, Faculty of Nursing, Bellvitge Campus, University of Barcelona (UB), 08907, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2630-2106
Virpi SulosaariHealth and Well-Being, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0898-3297
Eugenia TrigosoHospital University and Polytechnic LA FE, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2743-4522
Sara Margarida Rodrigues GomesNursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4599-7345
Ana Rita Cesario DiasFaculty of Dental Medicine, Health Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Silvija PiskorjanacUniversity J.J. Strossmayer Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.ORCID 0009-0002-6133-4285
Mary Anne TanayFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3637-6742
Halldóra HálfdánardóttirLandspitali - The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID 0009-0004-2764-9069
Maura DowlingSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7832-6276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) is a pan-European not for profit society involving approximately 28,000 cancer nurses from 32 countries in the region. The European College of Cancer Nursing (ECCN) exists under the umbrella of EONS and was established in 2020 with a strategic priority to develop, promote and deliver educational opportunities for nurses across Europe. ECCN introduced a pilot on-line education programme for 20 nurses in January 2023. This study evaluated participating nurses' views and experience of learning on the pilot programme. The study adopted a mixed method approach guided by the four levels of the Kirkpatrick theoretical framework. A dominant focus on qualitative data was used with supplementary quantitative data. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) was followed. Eleven nurses completed the pre-pilot online questionnaire (response rate 65%) and seven (n = 7) completed the post-pilot questionnaire (41% response rate). Five (n = 5) nurses participated in two focus group interviews. Data analysis resulted in the development of four overarching themes: A wider world of cancer nursing; Shapeless mentorship; Impact on Practice; Learning online and what now? On commencement of online education programmes, nurses value a structured timetable and support from nursing management to maximise engagement with the learning materials.

Indexed as

Oncology NursingAdultEducation, DistanceEuropeFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer nursingNursing educationOncology nursing

Identifiers

PMID38592656
PMCPMC11219416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.