Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592593›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Hygienic status of beef butcher shop facilities and antibiotic resistance profile of Salmonella enterica in Ethiopia.

Andarge Zelalem, Tafesse Koran, Kebede Abegaz, Zelalem Abera, Bahar Mummed, Abebe Olani, Abde Aliy, Meseret Chimdessa, Selam Fentahun, Carla L Schwan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andarge ZelalemSchool of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. andselam2014@gmail.com.
Tafesse KoranAnimal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Kebede AbegazDepartment of Food Science & Technology, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Zelalem AberaUniveristy Laboratory Management Directorate, Central Laboratories, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Bahar MummedCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Abebe OlaniAnimal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Abde AliyAnimal Health Institute, Sebeta, Ethiopia.
Meseret ChimdessaSchool of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia.
Selam FentahunSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Carla L SchwanDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Jessie L ViphamDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development # AID-OAA-L-15-00003USAID # AID-OAA-L-15-00003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiological quality of meat is influenced by the conditions of hygiene prevailing during production and handling. Thus, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of Salmonella enterica and its antimicrobial resistance, load of hygiene indicator bacteria including E. coli (ECC), coliforms (CC), total coliform (TCC), Enterobacteriaceae (EB) and aerobic plate count (APC), and meat handler's food safety knowledge and hygiene practices in butcher shops in two cities, Addis Ababa and Hawassa in Ethiopia, during 2020 and 2021. A total of 360 samples of beef carcasses (n = 120), knives (n = 60), chopping boards (n = 60), weighing balance (n = 60), and personnel's hands (n = 60) were randomly collected for microbial analysis. Besides, 120 participants were selected to participate in a food safety knowledge and hygiene practices assessment. The S. enterica isolates were identified by agglutination test followed by qPCR targeting invA gene. Phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles of S. enterica were determined using disk diffusion assays as described in CLSI. The ECC, CC, TCC, EB, and APC populations were quantified by plating onto petrifilm plates. A structured questionnaire was used to determine food safety knowledge and hygiene practices of participants. Overall prevalence of S. enterica was 16.7% (95% CI, 8.3-26.7) and location seems to have no effect (p = 0.806). Only 20% of the S. enterica were resistant to ampicillin and tetracycline. However, the majority (80%) of S. enterica isolates were susceptible to the panel of 11 antimicrobials tested. The overall mean ± SD (log CFU/cm

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialHygieneSalmonella entericaAdultAnimalsCattleEthiopiaFemaleFood HandlingFood MicrobiologyFood SafetyHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRed MeatAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceButcher shopsEthiopiaFood safetyHygiene indicator bacteriaHygiene practiceKnowledgeSalmonella enterica

Identifiers

PMID38592593
PMCPMC11153418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.