Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592559›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2024

Social demonstration of colour preference improves the learning of associated demonstrated actions.

Noam Zurek, Na'ama Aljadeff, Donya Khoury, Lucy M Aplin, Arnon Lotem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noam ZurekSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Na'ama AljadeffSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Donya KhourySchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Lucy M AplinDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Arnon LotemSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. lotem@tauex.tau.ac.il.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 1126/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied how different types of social demonstration improve house sparrows' (Passer domesticus) success in solving a foraging task that requires both operant learning (opening covers) and discrimination learning (preferring covers of the rewarding colour). We provided learners with either paired demonstration (of both cover opening and colour preference), action-only demonstration (of opening white covers only), or no demonstration (a companion bird eating without covers). We found that sparrows failed to learn the two tasks with no demonstration, and learned them best with a paired demonstration. Interestingly, the action of cover opening was learned faster with paired rather than action-only demonstration despite being equally demonstrated in both. We also found that only with paired demonstration, the speed of operant (action) learning was related to the demonstrator's level of activity. Colour preference (i.e. discrimination learning) was eventually acquired by all sparrows that learned to open covers, even without social demonstration of colour preference. Thus, adding a demonstration of colour preference was actually more important for operant learning, possibly as a result of increasing the similarity between the demonstrated and the learned tasks, thereby increasing the learner's attention to the actions of the demonstrator. Giving more attention to individuals in similar settings may be an adaptive strategy directing social learners to focus on ecologically relevant behaviours and on tasks that are likely to be learned successfully.

Indexed as

Discrimination LearningLearningAnimalsColorHumansRewardCognitive evolutionCognitive mechanismsHouse sparrowsMechanistic constraintsSocial learningSocial learning mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID38592559
PMCPMC11004050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.