Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592553›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024

Longitudinal stream synoptic (LSS) monitoring to evaluate water quality in restored streams.

Joseph T Malin, Sujay S Kaushal, Paul M Mayer, Carly M Maas, Steven P Hohman, Megan A Rippy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joseph T MalinDepartment of Geology & Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. joemalin@umd.edu.
Sujay S KaushalDepartment of Geology & Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Paul M MayerEnvironmental Protection Agency, 805 SW Broadway #500, Portland, OR, 97205, USA.
Carly M MaasDepartment of Geology & Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Steven P HohmanEnvironmental Protection Agency, 1650 Arch St, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA.
Megan A RippyOccoquan Watershed Monitoring Laboratory, The Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, 9408 Prince William Street, Manassas, VA, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impervious surface cover increases peak flows and degrades stream health, contributing to a variety of hydrologic, water quality, and ecological symptoms, collectively known as the urban stream syndrome. Strategies to combat the urban stream syndrome often employ engineering approaches to enhance stream-floodplain reconnection, dissipate erosive forces from urban runoff, and enhance contaminant retention, but it is not always clear how effective such practices are or how to monitor for their effectiveness. In this study, we explore applications of longitudinal stream synoptic (LSS) monitoring (an approach where multiple samples are collected along stream flowpaths across both space and time) to narrow this knowledge gap. Specifically, we investigate (1) whether LSS monitoring can be used to detect changes in water chemistry along longitudinal flowpaths in response to stream-floodplain reconnection and (2) what is the scale over which restoration efforts improve stream quality. We present results for four different classes of water quality constituents (carbon, nutrients, salt ions, and metals) across five watersheds with varying degrees of stream-floodplain reconnection. Our work suggests that LSS monitoring can be used to evaluate stream restoration strategies when implemented at meter to kilometer scales. As streams flow through restoration features, concentrations of nutrients, salts, and metals significantly decline (p < 0.05) or remain unchanged. This same pattern is not evident in unrestored streams, where salt ion concentrations (e.g., Na

Indexed as

RiversSaltsCarbonEnvironmental MonitoringSodium ChlorideWater QualityCarbonSaltsSodium ChlorideFreshwater salinizationNutrient pollutionRestorationUrban streamsWater quality assessment

Identifiers

PMID38592553
PMCPMC11069387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.