Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592452›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2024

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Cancer Status Detection in Radiology Reports.

Ankur Arya, Andrew Niederhausern, Nadia Bahadur, Neil J Shah, Chelsea Nichols, Avijit Chatterjee, John Philip

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ankur AryaDigital, Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-7822
Andrew NiederhausernDepartment of Translational Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0005-9499-2251
Nadia BahadurClinical & Translational Research Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2886-3687
Neil J ShahDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5752-6212
Chelsea NicholsDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0000-4367-2569
Avijit ChatterjeeDigital, Informatics and Technology Solutions, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-4839
John PhilipClinical & Translational Research Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0535-7178

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer research is dependent on accurate and relevant information of patient's medical journey. Data in radiology reports are of extreme value but lack consistent structure for direct use in analytics. At Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the radiology reports are curated using gold-standard approach of using human annotators. However, the manual process of curating large volume of retrospective data slows the pace of cancer research. Manual curation process is sensitive to volume of reports, number of data elements and nature of reports and demand appropriate skillset. In this work, we explore state of the art methods in artificial intelligence (AI) and implement end-to-end pipeline for fast and accurate annotation of radiology reports. Language models (LM) are trained using curated data by approaching curation as multiclass or multilabel classification problem. The classification tasks are to predict multiple imaging scan sites, presence of cancer and cancer status from the reports. The trained natural language processing (NLP) model classifiers achieve high weighted F1 score and accuracy. We propose and demonstrate the use of these models to assist in the manual curation process which results in higher accuracy and F1 score with lesser time and cost, thus improving efforts of cancer research. SIGNIFICANCE: Extraction of structured data in radiology for cancer research with manual process is laborious. Using AI for extraction of data elements is achieved using NLP models' assistance is faster and more accurate.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricNeoplasmsRadiologyArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansNatural Language ProcessingPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38592452
PMCPMC11003452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.