Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592381›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024

Randomized Phase II Trial of Imiquimod with or without 9-Valent HPV Vaccine versus Observation in Patients with High-grade Pre-neoplastic Cervical Lesions (NCT02864147).

Sangini S Sheth, Ji Eun Oh, Stefania Bellone, Eric R Siegel, Michelle Greenman, Levent Mutlu, Blair McNamara, Shefali Pathy, Mitchell Clark, Masoud Azodi and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Viral oncogenesis in cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sangini S Sheth *Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Specialties and Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-3154-9624
Ji Eun Oh *Laboratory of Skin and Mucosal Immunology, Graduate School of Medical Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2511-7064
Stefania BelloneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-5292
Eric R SiegelDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.ORCID 0000-0001-9824-6612
Michelle GreenmanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-1468
Levent MutluDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0009-0000-5861-9277
Blair McNamaraDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-0228-218X
Shefali PathyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Specialties and Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-0086-6416
Mitchell ClarkDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-1118-9585
Masoud AzodiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-8089
Gary AltwergerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-2252-947X
Vaagn AndikyanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-9326-0255
Gloria HuangDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-0001-888X
Elena RatnerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-6002
Daniel J KimDepartment of Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-4351-8224
Akiko IwasakiDepartment of Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-7824-9856
Angelique W LeviDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-0519-3393
Natalia BuzaDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-334X
Pei HuiDepartment of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-6285-7817
Sean FlahertyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Specialties and Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0009-0002-1056-8006
Peter E SchwartzDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-3624
Alessandro D SantinDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Smilow Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-4724-9738

Funding

Yale Cancer Center GS055459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe report the results of a randomized phase II trial of imiquimod, a topical immune-response modulator versus imiquimod plus a 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (9vHPV) versus clinical surveillance in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3) patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe randomly allocated 133 patients with untreated CIN2/3 in equal proportions to a 4-month treatment with self-applied vaginal suppositories containing imiquimod (Arm B) or imiquimod plus a 9vHPV (Arm C) versus clinical surveillance (Arm A). The main outcome was efficacy, defined as histologic regression to CIN1 or less. Secondary outcomes were HPV clearance and tolerability. Exploratory objectives included the comparison of cervical CD4/CD8 T-cell infiltration at baseline, mid-study, and posttreatment by flow cytometry among study arms.

resultsOf the 114 evaluable patients 77% and 23% harbored CIN2 and CIN3, respectively. Regression to CIN1 or less was observed in 95% of patients in the imiquimod group (Arm B) compared with 79% in the control/surveillance (Arm A); P = 0.043 and 84% in the imiquimod+9vHPV group (Arm C; P = 0.384 vs. Arm A). Neither of the treatment-arm differences from Arm A reached the prespecified α = 0.025 significance level. No significant differences were noted in the secondary outcome of rate of HPV clearance. The number of tissue-resident memory CD4/CD8 T cells in cytobrush samples demonstrated a >5-fold increase in Arm B/imiquimod when compared with Arm A/surveillance (P < 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant difference in T-cell responses among participants in Arm C when compared with Arm A. Imiquimod treatment was well tolerated.

conclusionsAlthough imiquimod induced a higher regression to CIN1 or less and significant increases in CD4/CD8 T cells infiltrating the cervix, it did not meet its prespecified statistical outcome for efficacy. A higher regression rate than expected was observed in the surveillance arm of this prospective trial. Future clinical trials with imiquimod targeting CIN3 patients are warranted.

Indexed as

ImiquimodPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAminoquinolinesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrecancerous ConditionsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAminoquinolinesImiquimodPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.