ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Evaluation of Choroidal Structure in Type 1 Macular Neovascularization Using Different Optical Coherence Tomography Analyses: Scale Bar and Binarization.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMacular neovascularization (MNV) has been evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging using various approaches. However, few studies have examined their differences. This study analyzed type 1 MNV with a combination of two approaches: scale bar and binarization.
methodsWe enrolled 84 patients with untreated type 1 MNV. We measured choroidal parameters using a scale bar and defined the ratios of superficial choroidal thickness to choroidal vessel diameter (SV ratios). We also used binarization and calculated the ratios of the luminal to the choroidal area (LC ratios) in two directions (horizontal and vertical).
resultsFifty-one patients (61%) were classified as having polyps. SV ratios in the group with polyps were significantly lower than in the group without (
conclusionThe SV ratio reflects the MNV disease type, whereas the LC ratio reflects MNV disease activity. Establishing cut-off values for each ratio may be useful for MNV diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.