Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592166›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

The Added Value of MRI-Based Targeted Biopsy in Biopsy-Naïve Patients: A Propensity-Score Matched Comparison.

Gernot Ortner, Charalampos Mavridis, Veronika Fritz, Jörg Schachtner, Charalampos Mamoulakis, Udo Nagele, Theodoros Tokas

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06517901 (MRI-targeted Fusion or Cognitive Ultrasound-guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06517901 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

MRI-targeted Fusion or Cognitive Ultrasound-guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbany Medical CollegeRan2025 to 2027Enrolled1,306ConditionsProstate Cancer, DiagnosisArmsSoftware fusion prostate biopsy, Cognitive fusion prostate biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gernot OrtnerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T., 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2454-6599
Charalampos MavridisDepartment of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0480-7499
Veronika FritzDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T., 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Jörg SchachtnerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T., 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Charalampos MamoulakisDepartment of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8662-1275
Udo NageleDepartment of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T., 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Theodoros TokasTraining and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-0507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI)-based targeted biopsy has shown to be beneficial in detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) and avoiding diagnosis of Non-csPCa (ncsPCa); however, its role in the treatment of biopsy-naïve patients is still under discussion.

methodsAfter identifying predictors for the diagnosis of csPCa via Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis (MLRA), a propensity-score (1:1 nearest neighbor) matched comparison was performed between a Systematic-Only Biopsy (SOB) cohort and a mpMRI-based Combined (systematic + targeted) Biopsy (CB) cohort from two tertiary urologic centers (SOB: Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, School of Medicine, Heraklion, Crete, Greece; CB: LKH Hall in Tirol, Austria). Only biopsy-naïve patients were included in the study. The study period for the included patients was from February 2018 to July 2023 for the SOB group and from July 2017 to June 2023 for the CB group. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of csPCa (≥ISUP 2); secondary outcomes were overall cancer detection, the added value of targeted biopsy in csPCa detection, and the reduction in ncsPCa diagnosis with CB compared to SOB. To estimate the Average Treatment effect of the Treated groups (ATT), cluster-robust standard errors were used to perform g-computation in the matched sample.

resultsMatching achieved well-balanced groups (each

conclusionThe CB approach was superior to the SOB approach in detecting csPCa, while no additional detection of ncsPCa was seen. Our results support the application of mpMRI for biopsy-naïve patients with suspicions of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

added valuebiopsy-naïve patientsclinically significant cancercombined biopsydetectionmpMRIMRI fusion biopsyprostate biopsysystematic biopsytargeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38592166
PMCPMC10931596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.