ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Validation of a Three-Dimensional Weight-Bearing Measurement Protocol for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High variability exists in 3D leg alignment analysis, but underlying principles that might lead to agreement on a universal framework could be identified: A systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning Measurements for High Tibial Osteotomy.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- A structured framework for standardized 3D leg alignment analysis: An international Delphi consensus study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Preoperative difference between 2D and 3D planning correlates with difference between planned and achieved surgical correction in patient-specific instrumented total knee arthroplasty.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Navigation surgery in musculoskeletal disorders.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) deformity assessment and leg realignment planning is emerging. The aim of this study was to (1) validate a novel 3D planning modality that incorporates the weight-bearing (WB) state (3D WB) by comparing it to existing modalities (3D non-weight-bearing (NWB), 2D WB) and (2) evaluate the influence of the modality (2D vs. 3D) and the WB condition on the measurements. Three different planning and deformity measurement protocols were analyzed in 19 legs that underwent medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO): (1) a 3D WB protocol, after 2D/3D registration of 3D CT models onto the long-leg radiograph (LLR) (3D WB), (2) a 3D NWB protocol based on the 3D surface models obtained in the supine position (3D NWB), and (3) a 2D WB protocol based on the LLR (2D WB). The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and the achieved surgical correction were measured for each modality and patient. All the measurement protocols demonstrated excellent intermodal agreement for the achieved surgical correction, with an ICC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.76-0.96)) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.