ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
CMR Predictors of Favorable Outcome in Myocarditis: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance atrial and ventricular strain for adverse prognosis in patients with myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Outcomes by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with clinically suspected myocardial inflammation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Myocarditis Prognostic Score: A New Risk Assessment Tool.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Evolution in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Myocarditis in Recent Years: State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- The role of cardiac lymphatic dysfunction in the progression of myocarditis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Atlas of Regional Left Ventricular Scar in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies: Substrates and Etiologies.JACC. Advances · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.