Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592074›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Retrotrigonal Layer Dissection from a Posterior Approach Enables Bladder Neck Preservation in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Satoshi Washino, Kimitoshi Saito, Yuhki Nakamura, Tomoaki Miyagawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Satoshi WashinoDepartment of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-6424
Kimitoshi SaitoDepartment of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan.
Yuhki NakamuraDepartment of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan.
Tomoaki MiyagawaDepartment of Urology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 330-0834, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed a novel surgical technique: dissection of the retrotrigonal layer from a posterior approach in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This approach enables earlier access to the posterior space during bladder neck dissection and helps preserve the bladder neck. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this technique in terms of bladder neck preservation Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 238 consecutive patients who underwent RARP using this technique from August 2021 to September 2023. Key metrics included the success rate of accessing the posterior space prior to bladder neck opening during the dissection and the rate of bladder neck preservation. In addition, oncological and surgical safety, as well as continence recovery, were assessed.

resultsThe median age and prostate-specific antigen level were 72 (65-75) years and 7.35 (5.40-11.5) ng/mL, respectively. In 153 (64%) patients, the posterior space was successfully accessed before bladder neck opening, with the success rate increasing from 56% in the series' first half to 72% in the second half (

conclusionRetrotrigonal layer dissection from a posterior approach in RARP enhances the safety and ease of bladder neck dissection and aids in its preservation, potentially leading to improved continence recovery.

Indexed as

bladder neck dissectionbladder neck preservationretrotrigonal layerrobot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID38592074
PMCPMC10931727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.