Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592067›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Assessing the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on Disability-A Systematic Review.

Claudia-Gabriela Potcovaru, Teodor Salmen, Dragoș Bîgu, Miruna Ioana Săndulescu, Petruța Violeta Filip, Laura Sorina Diaconu, Corina Pop, Ileana Ciobanu, Delia Cinteză, Mihai Berteanu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Benefits and Importance of Early Rehabilitation in Patients After Stroke.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudia-Gabriela PotcovaruDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0009-0003-5801-5416
Teodor SalmenDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-7441
Dragoș BîguDepartment of Philosophy and Social and Human Sciences, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana. No. 6, District 1, 010374 Bucharest, Romania.
Miruna Ioana SăndulescuDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Petruța Violeta FilipDepartment of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Laura Sorina DiaconuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Corina PopDepartment of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ileana CiobanuPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Elias University Emergency Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania.
Delia CintezăPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department 9, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6216-6688
Mihai BerteanuPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department 9, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-4580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a tool designed to measure disability in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Measuring disability is becoming increasingly important due to its high prevalence, which continues to rise. Rehabilitation interventions can reduce disability and enhance functioning. (2) Objective: The present study aims to assess the impact of rehabilitation interventions on reducing disability, as measured by the WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire. It also seeks to identify which specific rehabilitation interventions are more effective and to explore other disability assessment questionnaires. (3) Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a systematic review, with the protocol registered with the identifier CRD42023495309, focused on "WHODAS" and "rehabilitation" using PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases. (4) Results: We identified 18 articles from various regions encompassing patients with various health conditions, related to stroke, the cardiovascular system (cardiovascular disease, chronic heart failure), the pulmonary system (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), the neurologic system (Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, neurodegenerative disease), the musculoskeletal system (orthopaedic surgery), cancer, and chronic pain, and among frail elderly. These patients have received a wide range of rehabilitation interventions: from conventional therapy to virtual reality, robot-assisted arm training, exergaming, and telerehabilitation. (5) Discussion and Conclusions: A wide range of rehabilitation techniques can effectively improve disability with various comorbidities, offering numerous benefits. The WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire proves to be an efficient and reliable tool for measuring disability, and scores have a tendency to decrease after rehabilitation.

Indexed as

disabilityICFrehabilitation interventionsWHODAS 2.0

Identifiers

PMID38592067
PMCPMC10931950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.