ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Teduglutide Treatment in Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome in Slovakia-Multicenter Real-World Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of teduglutide in children with short bowel syndrome: a narrative review.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Review
- [Use of teduglutide in short bowel syndrome in infants, children and adolescents: Position paper of the working group "Chronic intestinal failure" of the Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (GPGE)].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Teduglutide Treatment in Adult Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome: A Case Series and Review of Current Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing teduglutide treatment regimens in children with short bowel syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Effectiveness, safety, and quality of life outcomes of teduglutide treatment in adult patients with short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure: A systematic literature review of real-world studies.Intestinal Failure (New York, N.Y.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.