ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024
A Novel Ear Impression-Taking Method Using Structured Light Imaging and Machine Learning: A Pilot Proof of Concept Study with Patients' Feedback on Prototype.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Audiology: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTaking an ear impression is a minimally invasive procedure. A review of existing literature suggests that contactless methods of scanning the ear have not been developed. We proposed to establish a correlation between external ear features with the ear canal and with this proof of concept to develop a prototype and an algorithm for capturing and predicting ear canal information.
methodsWe developed a novel prototype using structured light imaging to capture external images of the ear. Using a large database of existing ear impression images obtained by traditional methods, correlation analyses were carried out and established. A deep neural network was devised to build a predictive algorithm. Patients undergoing hearing aid evaluation undertook both methods of ear impression-taking. We evaluated their subjective feedback and determined if there was a close enough objective match between the images obtained from the impression techniques.
resultsA prototype was developed and deployed for trial, and most participants were comfortable with this novel method of ear impression-taking. Partial matching of the ear canal could be obtained from the images taken, and the predictive algorithm applied for a few sample images was within good standard of error with proof of concept established. DISCUSSION: Further studies are warranted to strengthen the predictive capabilities of the algorithm and determine optimal prototype imaging positions so that sufficient ear canal information can be obtained for three-dimensional printing. Ear impression-taking may then have the potential to be automated, with the possibility of same-day three-dimensional printing of the earmold to provide timely access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.