Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38592018›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Re-Do Plastic Reconstruction for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Following a beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) Operation-Key Considerations.

Emmanuel Giannas, Konstantinos Kavallieros, Theodoros Nanidis, John Giannas, Paris Tekkis, Christos Kontovounisios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emmanuel GiannasDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.
Konstantinos KavallierosDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0912-9383
Theodoros NanidisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
John GiannasDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Euroclinic, 115 21 Athens, Greece.
Paris TekkisDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.
Christos KontovounisiosDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1828-1395

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innovation in surgery and pelvic oncology have redefined the boundaries of pelvic exenteration for CRC. However, surgical approaches and outcomes following repeat exenteration and reconstruction are not well described. The resulting defect from a second beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) presents a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The aim of this study was to explore reconstructive options for patients undergoing repeat beyond TME for recurrent CRC following previous beyond TME and regional reconstruction. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for relevant articles, yielding 2353 studies. However, following full text review and the application of the inclusion criteria, all the studies were excluded. This study demonstrated the lack of reporting on re-do reconstruction techniques following repeat exenteration for recurrent CRC. Based on this finding, we conducted a point-by-point discussion of certain key aspects that should be taken into consideration when approaching this patient cohort.

Indexed as

beyond TMEcolorectal cancerpelvic exenterationreconstructionrecurrent

Identifiers

PMID38592018
PMCPMC10932044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.