Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38591984›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Effect of Particle Strength on SiCp/Al Composite Properties with Network Architecture Design.

Xiang Gao, Xiaonan Lu, Xuexi Zhang, Mingfang Qian, Aibin Li, Lin Geng, Huan Wang, Cheng Liu, Wenting Ouyang, Hua-Xin Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microstructure and Properties of Ag-SnOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiang GaoNingbo Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4147-7070
Xiaonan LuNingbo Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China.
Xuexi ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7939-7025
Mingfang QianSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2928-1008
Aibin LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Lin GengSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Huan WangInstitute for Composites Science Innovation (InCSI), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 300027, China.
Cheng LiuInstitute for Composites Science Innovation (InCSI), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 300027, China.
Wenting OuyangInstitute for Composites Science Innovation (InCSI), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 300027, China.
Hua-Xin PengNingbo Innovation Center, Zhejiang University, Ningbo 315100, China.

Funding

"Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang 2022C01087National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFB3707401National Natural Science Foundation of China 52101184, 52192593Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province TD2020E001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent works have experimentally proven that metal matrix composites (MMCs) with network architecture present improved strength-ductility match. It is envisaged that the performance of architecturally designed composites is particularly sensitive to reinforcement strength. Here, reinforcing particles with various fracture strengths were introduced in numerical models of composites with network particle distribution. The results revealed that a low particle strength (1 GPa) led to early-stage failure and brittle fracture. Nevertheless, a high particle strength (5 GPa) delayed the failure behavior and led to ductile fracture at the SiC/Al-Al macro-interface areas. Therefore, the ultimate tensile strengths (UTS) of the network SiC/Al composites increased from 290 to 385 MPa, with rising particle strength from 1 to 5 GPa. Based on the composite property, different particle fracture threshold strengths existed for homogeneous (~2.7 GPa) and network (~3.7 GPa) composites. The higher threshold strength in network composites was related to the increased stress concentration induced by network architecture. Unfortunately, the real fracture strength of the commercial SiC particle is 1-2 GPa, implying that it is possible to select a high-strength particle necessary for efficient network architecture design.

Indexed as

finite element analysis (FEA)interfacemetal matrix composites (MMCs)micro-mechanicsnetwork architecture

Identifiers

PMID38591984
PMCPMC10856433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.