ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Early Single-Examination Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers for Treatment-Requiring Retinopathy of Prematurity.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of handheld optical coherence tomography imaging in the surgical management of preterm infants with advanced retinopathy of prematurity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Very Preterm Infant Retinal Microanatomy at 36 Weeks' Postmenstrual Age and 2-Year Neurodevelopment.JAMA ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Retinal and Choroidal OCT Measures and Features at Term Equivalent Age in Preterm and Term Infants.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Pigment epithelium detachment with thickened choroid in a preterm infant at term-equivalent age: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an emerging adjunct imaging modality to evaluate retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). From an 11-year research database, we identify early OCT biomarkers that predict treatment-requiring ROP (TR-ROP). Methods: For preterm infants with acceptable OCT images at 32 ± 1 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), we extracted the following measures: total retina, inner retinal layer (IRL), and outer retinal layer (ORL) thicknesses at the fovea and the parafovea, inner nuclear layer (INL) and choroidal thickness, parafovea/fovea (P/F) ratio, and presence of macular edema. Using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, we evaluated the association between retinal and choroidal OCT measurements at 32 ± 1 weeks PMA and development of TR-ROP. Results: Of 277 eyes (145 infants) with usable OCT images, 67 eyes had TR-ROP. Lower P/F ratio (P < 0.0001), thicker foveal IRL (P = 0.0001), and thinner choroid (P = 0.03) were associated with TR-ROP in univariable analysis, but lost significance of association when adjusted for gestational age and race. Absence of macular edema was associated with TR-ROP when adjusted for gestational age and race (P = 0.01). In 185 eyes without macular edema, P/F ratio was associated with TR-ROP in both univariable analysis (P < 0.0001) and multivariable analysis (P = 0.02) with adjustment for gestational age and race. Conclusions: Presence of macular edema at 32 ± 1 weeks PMA in infants with lower gestational age may be protective against TR-ROP. In infants without macular edema, P/F ratio may be an early OCT biomarker for development of TR-ROP. Incorporation of early OCT biomarkers may be useful in prediction of TR-ROP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.