Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38591920›Full record

Trial reportGut microbes

Multi-strain probiotics during pregnancy in women with obesity influence infant gut microbiome development: results from a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Sofie Ingdam Halkjær, Malene Refslund Danielsen, Victoria E de Knegt, Lee O'Brien Andersen, Christen Rune Stensvold, Henrik Vedel Nielsen, Hengameh Chloé Mirsepasi-Lauridsen, Karen Angeliki Krogfelt, Dina Cortes, Andreas Munk Petersen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sofie Ingdam HalkjærGastrounit,Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-4252
Malene Refslund DanielsenGastrounit,Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-1981-8983
Victoria E de KnegtDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-2593
Lee O'Brien AndersenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0009-6266-6514
Christen Rune StensvoldDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-7048
Henrik Vedel NielsenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6773-1874
Hengameh Chloé Mirsepasi-LauridsenDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-3262
Karen Angeliki KrogfeltDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-3453
Dina CortesDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6852-6530
Andreas Munk PetersenGastrounit,Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0531-0553

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have been described to influence host health and prevent the risk of obesity by gut microbiome (GM) modulation. In a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled feasibility study, we investigated whether Vivomixx® multi-strain probiotics administered to 50 women with obesity during pregnancy altered the GM composition and perinatal health outcomes of their infants up to 9 months after birth. The mothers and infants were followed up with four visits after birth: at 3 d, and at 3, 6, and 9 months after delivery. The infants were monitored by anthropometric measurements, fecal sample analysis, and questionnaires regarding health and diet.The study setup after birth was feasible, and the women and infants were willing to participate in additional study visits and collection of fecal samples during the 9-month follow-up. In total, 47 newborns were included for microbiome analysis.Maternal prenatal Vivomixx® administration did not alter infant GM diversity nor differential abundance, and the probiotic strains were not vertically transferred. However, the infant GM exhibited a decreased prevalence of the obesity-associated genera,

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsCesarean SectionDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFecesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersObesityPregnancyinfantmicrobiomemicrobiotanewbornObesitypregnancyprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID38591920
PMCPMC11005804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.