Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38591890›Full record

ArticlemBio2024

Distinct patterns of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.87.1 and JN.1 variants in immune evasion, antigenicity, and cell-cell fusion.

Pei Li, Yajie Liu, Julia N Faraone, Cheng Chih Hsu, Michelle Chamblee, Yi-Min Zheng, Claire Carlin, Joseph S Bednash, Jeffrey C Horowitz, Rama K Mallampalli and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intranasal measles virus- and mumps virus-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pei LiCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Yajie LiuCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Julia N FaraoneCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Cheng Chih HsuDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michelle ChambleeDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Yi-Min ZhengCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Claire CarlinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Joseph S BednashDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jeffrey C HorowitzDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Rama K MallampalliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Linda J SaifCenter for Food Animal Health, Animal Sciences Department, OARDC, College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3224-9009
Eugene M OltzDepartment of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Daniel JonesDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jianrong LiDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7130-1084
Richard J GuminaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Shan-Lu LiuCenter for Retrovirus Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-3817
The Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Role of the Non-canonical Inflammasome in SARS-CoV-2-mediated Pathology and CoagulopathyP01AI175399 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Amal O Amer, Estelle A Cormet-Boyaka · 2024 to 2026
$12.0M
Project 3: Responding to Changing Serological and Viral Information around COVID-19 (RESPOND)U54CA260582 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK, OLTZ, EUGENE M · 2020 to 2024
$10.4M
Messenger RNA Capping and Methylation in PneumovirusesR01AI090060 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIANRONG · 2011 to 2023
$4.0M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002734 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARNES, CYNTHIA A · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
The impact of vitamin A on the gut-mammary gland-secretory IgA axis during enteric viral infectionsR01HD095881 · NICHD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAIF, LINDA J., VLASOVA, ANASTASIA NICKOLAEVNA · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Interdisciplinary Program in Microbe-Host BiologyT32AI165391 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RAJENDAR K DEORA, Daniel J Wozniak · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
RNA internal 2’-O methylation in SARS-CoV-2R21AI180667 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIANRONG · 2024 to 2025
$453k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002734NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NCI NIH HHS U54 CA260582NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI175399NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI090060NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI180667NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI165391NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants presents a constant challenge to the global vaccination effort. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into two newly emerged variants, BA.2.87.1 and JN.1, focusing on their neutralization resistance, infectivity, antigenicity, cell-cell fusion, and spike processing. Neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers were assessed in diverse cohorts, including individuals who received a bivalent mRNA vaccine booster, patients infected during the BA.2.86/JN.1-wave, and hamsters vaccinated with XBB.1.5-monovalent vaccine. We found that BA.2.87.1 shows much less nAb escape from WT-BA.4/5 bivalent mRNA vaccination and JN.1-wave breakthrough infection sera compared to JN.1 and XBB.1.5. Interestingly, BA.2.87.1 is more resistant to neutralization by XBB.1.5-monovalent-vaccinated hamster sera than BA.2.86/JN.1 and XBB.1.5, but efficiently neutralized by a class III monoclonal antibody S309, which largely fails to neutralize BA.2.86/JN.1. Importantly, BA.2.87.1 exhibits higher levels of infectivity, cell-cell fusion activity, and furin cleavage efficiency than BA.2.86/JN.1. Antigenically, we found that BA.2.87.1 is closer to the ancestral BA.2 compared to other recently emerged Omicron subvariants including BA.2.86/JN.1 and XBB.1.5. Altogether, these results highlight immune escape properties as well as biology of new variants and underscore the importance of continuous surveillance and informed decision-making in the development of effective vaccines. IMPORTANCE: This study investigates the recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 variants, BA.2.87.1 and JN.1, in comparison to earlier variants and the parental D614G. Varied infectivity and cell-cell fusion activity among these variants suggest potential disparities in their ability to infect target cells and possibly pathogenesis. BA.2.87.1 exhibits lower nAb escape from bivalent mRNA vaccinee and BA.2.86/JN.1-infected sera than JN.1 but is relatively resistance to XBB.1.5-vaccinated hamster sera, revealing distinct properties in immune reason and underscoring the significance of continuing surveillance of variants and reformulation of vaccines. Antigenic differences between BA.2.87.1 and other earlier variants yield critical information not only for antibody evasion but also for viral evolution. In conclusion, this study furnishes timely insights into the spike biology and immune escape of the emerging variants BA.2.87.1 and JN.1, thus guiding effective vaccine development and informing public health interventions.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCell FusionCOVID-19Immune EvasionSARS-CoV-2AnimalsCOVID-19 VaccinesCricetinaeHumansSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2BA.2.87.1cell-cell fusionfurin cleavageinfectivityJN.1neutralizing antibodySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID38591890
PMCPMC11077997
OpenAlexW4394621470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.