ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Design, Stereolithographic 3D Printing, and Characterization of TPMS Scaffolds.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation craniomaxillofacial implants for reconstructive surgery: balancing biomechanics, biocompatibility, and bioactivity.International journal of oral science · 2026Review
- An Overview of Additive Manufacturing of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface (TPMS) Structures.Polymers · 2025Review
- Effect on three-dimensional collective cell organization of minimal curvature surfaces.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Novel TPMS Lattice Materials: Design Optimization, Performance Control, and Applications in Biomimetic Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mechanical Characterization of Porous Bone-like Scaffolds with Complex Microstructures for Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Novel 3D printed TPMS scaffolds: microstructure, characteristics and applications in bone regeneration.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomical and functional tissue loss is one of the most debilitating problems and involves a great cost to the international health-care sector. In the field of bone tissue, the use of scaffolds to promote tissue regeneration is a topic of great interest. In this study, a combination of additive manufacturing and computational methods led to creating porous scaffolds with complex microstructure and mechanical behavior comparable to those of cancellous bone. Specifically, some representative models of triply periodic minimal surfaces (TPMSs) were 3D-printed through a stereolithographic technique using a dental resin. Schwarz primitive and gyroid surfaces were created computationally: they are characterized by a complex geometry and a high pore interconnectivity, which play a key role in the mechanism of cell proliferation. Several design parameters can be varied in these structures that can affect the performance of the scaffold: for example, the larger the wall thickness, the lower the elastic modulus and compressive strength. Morphological and mechanical analyses were performed to experimentally assess the properties of the scaffolds. The relationship between relative density and elastic modulus has been analyzed by applying different models, and a power-law equation was found suitable to describe the trend in both structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.