ArticleCancer medicine2024
Pursuing dynamics of minimal residual leukemic subclones in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia during conventional therapy.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Landscape of TP53 Mutations in Hematologic Malignancies.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Ultrasensitive Detection of Rare Mutations via Amplifying-Cleaving-Enriching in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Pursuing dynamics of minimal residual leukemic subclones in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia during conventional therapy.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by clonal heterogeneity, leading to frequent relapses and drug resistance despite intensive clinical therapy. Although AML's clonal architecture has been addressed in many studies, practical monitoring of dynamic changes in those subclones during relapse and treatment is still understudied.
methodFifteen longitudinal bone marrow (BM) samples were collected from three relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML patients. Using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), the frequencies of patient's leukemic variants were assessed in seven cell populations that were isolated from each BM sample based on cellular phenotypes. By quantifying mutant clones at the diagnosis, remission, and relapse stages, the distribution of AML subclones was sequentially monitored.
resultsMinimal residual (MR) leukemic subclones exhibit heterogeneous distribution among BM cell populations, including mature leukocyte populations. During AML progression, these subclones undergo active phenotypic transitions and repopulate into distinct cell population regardless of normal hematopoiesis hierarchic order. Of these, MR subclones in progenitor populations of patient BM predominantly carry MR leukemic properties, leading to more robust expansion and stubborn persistence than those in mature populations. Moreover, a minor subset of MR leukemic subclones could be sustained at an extremely low frequency without clonal expansion during relapse.
conclusionsIn this study, we observed treatment persistent MR leukemic subclones and their phenotypic changes during the treatment process of R/R AML patients. This underscores the importance of preemptive inhibition of clonal promiscuity in R/R AML, proposing a practical method for monitoring AML MR subclones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.