ArticleOphthalmology science
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Individual Geographic Atrophy Progression from a Single Baseline OCT.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Detection and Management of Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using Noninvasive Retinal Images and Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: From diagnostic accuracy to clinical application.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- I-SCREEN: Development of an AI-based infrastructure for community-wide screening and prediction of progression in age-related macular degeneration providing accessible shared care.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Histologic Photoreceptor and Retinal Pigment Epithelium Degeneration in an Eye With Clinically Documented Geographic Atrophy of AMD.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy in Longitudinally Acquired Fundus Autofluorescence Images.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- SWAU-Net: Longitudinal Prediction of Geographic Atrophy via Sliding-Window Attention.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- [Progression assessment for geographic atrophy].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Approaches to Predict Geographic Atrophy Progression Using Three-Dimensional OCT Imaging.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Fundus Autofluorescence Variation in Geographic Atrophy of Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Clinicopathologic Correlation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Retinal Diseases.Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2024Review
- New horizons in geographic atrophy treatment: enthusiasm and caution surrounding complement inhibitors.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify the individual progression of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions from baseline OCT images of patients in routine clinical care. Design: Clinical evaluation of a deep learning-based algorithm. Subjects: One hundred eighty-four eyes of 100 consecutively enrolled patients. Methods: OCT and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images (both Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) of patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical care were used for model validation. Fundus autofluorescence images were annotated manually by delineating the GA area by certified readers of the Vienna Reading Center. The annotated FAF images were anatomically registered in an automated manner to the corresponding OCT scans, resulting in 2-dimensional en face OCT annotations, which were taken as a reference for the model performance. A deep learning-based method for modeling the GA lesion growth over time from a single baseline OCT was evaluated. In addition, the ability of the algorithm to identify fast progressors for the top 10%, 15%, and 20% of GA growth rates was analyzed. Main Outcome Measures: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute error (MAE) between manual and predicted GA growth. Results: The deep learning-based tool was able to reliably identify disease activity in GA using a standard OCT image taken at a single baseline time point. The mean DSC for the total GA region increased for the first 2 years of prediction (0.80-0.82). With increasing time intervals beyond 3 years, the DSC decreased slightly to a mean of 0.70. The MAE was low over the first year and with advancing time slowly increased, with mean values ranging from 0.25 mm to 0.69 mm for the total GA region prediction. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.81, 0.79, and 0.77 for the identification of the top 10%, 15%, and 20% growth rates, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed algorithm is capable of fully automated GA lesion growth prediction from a single baseline OCT in a time-continuous fashion in the form of en face maps. The results are a promising step toward clinical decision support tools for therapeutic dosing and guidance of patient management because the first treatment for GA has recently become available. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.