ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Host-independent metagenomics reveal gut bacteria contribution to Delia antiqua growth by vitamin B6 provision.Insect molecular biology · 2026Article
- Crosstalk in the cold: host-microbe interactions in insect diapause.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2026Review
- Alterations in the Gut Microbiome ofInsects · 2026Article
- Isolation of the symbiotic bacterium Brevundimonas aurantiaca and its potential role in modulating reproductive traits in Culex pipiens pallens.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Regional Soil and Soybean-Associated Bacterial Communities Are Linked to Larval Nutritional Composition in the Edible InsectInsects · 2026Article
- Metagenomic insights into regional gut microbiota variation of invasive Spodoptera frugiperda across the Gaoligong Mountains.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Metagenomic analysis of gut bacteria in different developmental instars ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Review
- Response of Nutritional Values and Gut Microbiomes to Dietary Intake of ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids inInsects · 2025Article
- Guava root exudate-driven rhizosphere microorganisms changes transmitted to foliar-feeding insects influence their feeding behaviour.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Intestinal microbiome changes in response to amino acid and micronutrient supplementation: secondary analysis of the AMAZE trial.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Comparison of distinct gut bacterial communities in different stage of prediapause and nondiapause larvae inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The soybean hawkmoth, Methods: The dominant gut bacterium in diapause larvae of soybean hawkmoths was identified by metagenomics, and the effect of diapause time on gut microbiome composition, diversity and function was investigated. Results: Discussion: This study not only extends our knowledge of gut microbiome in soybean hawkmoths at the species level, but also provides an initial investigation of gene functionality in interaction with insect hosts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.