Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590943›Full record

ArticleReproductive medicine and biology

Impact of current and previous sperm findings on outcomes of intrauterine insemination.

Maki Taniguchi, Haruhiko Kanasaki, Aki Oride, Hiroe Okada, Kayo Imamura, Satoru Kyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maki TaniguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo Japan.
Haruhiko KanasakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7011-8109
Aki OrideDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6609-2487
Hiroe OkadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo Japan.
Kayo ImamuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unnan City Hospital Unnan Japan.
Satoru KyoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Shimane University Faculty of Medicine Izumo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association between semen characteristics and outcomes of intrauterine insemination (IUI). Methods: This retrospective analysis examined 1380 IUI procedures involving 421 couples. The association of clinical pregnancy with pre- and post-wash sperm characteristics was assessed. Results: Pre- and post-wash sperm characteristics did not differ between IUI cycles that resulted in pregnancy and those that did not. When the motility of pre-wash sperm was below the normal range (<42%) established by the World Health Organization (WHO), the pregnancy rate was significantly lower. In the IUI cycles when post-wash sperm motility was below the WHO standard, pregnancy was not achieved. The frequency of improvement in post-wash sperm motility in repeated IUI cycles appeared to correlate with the success of future IUI cycles. At the fourth IUI cycle, pregnancy was not achieved unless the post-wash sperm motility was normal in at least two of three attempts. When post-wash sperm concentration was below the normal range, the woman's age did not affect the IUI outcomes. Conclusions: Sperm motility above the lower limit of the WHO criteria in post-wash semen samples is an important factor in IUI outcomes.

Indexed as

infertilityIUIsperm findings

Identifiers

PMID38590943
PMCPMC11000811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.