ArticleHeliyon2024
The value of modified hijdra score in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Bedside Coagulation-Platelet Tipping Point for Mortality in Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The complexity of calculating the Hijdra score has limited its clinical utility in aiding the diagnosis of intracranial ruptured aneurysms. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the modified Hijdra score in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Methods: Data from 773 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) at the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from January 2018 to June 2023 were collected. The modified Hijdra scoring method simplifies the assessment of 10 basal cisterns/cisterns fissures compared to the traditional scoring method, with scores ranging from 0 to 2 for each item, and assigns specific scores to hematomas larger than 1 cm in diameter. The data were divided into an evaluation group (n = 641) and a validation group (n = 132). In the evaluation group, the performance of the modified Hijdra score in diagnosis and prognostic prediction was assessed, while the diagnostic and prognostic prediction efficacy of the modified Hijdra method was evaluated using the validation set. Results: Among the 641 patients in the evaluation group,550 (85. 8%) were diagnosed with intracranial aneurysms. The modified Hijdra score demonstrated an AUC of 0. 894 for aneurysm diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 98. 0% and a specificity of 64. 8% at a CutOff value of 7. 5. The diagnostic efficacy of the modified Hijdra score was 93. 24%, with a negative predictive value of 84. 29%, while the Hijdra score 's diagnostic efficacy was 85. 34% with a negative predictive value of 48. 89%. The AUC of the modified Hijdra score for predicting prognosis in patients with aneurysms was 0. 824, with a sensitivity of 84. 3% and a specificity of 70. 0% at a CutOff value of 16. 5. In CTA-negative patients, the modified Hijdra score was significantly higher (P < 0. 0001) in patients with aneurysmal SAH (15. 48 ± 3. 93) compared to those with non-aneurysmal SAH (6. 31 ± 4. 52). Conclusions: The modified Hijdra score is a valuable tool for assisting in the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.