Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590890›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A federated authentication schema among multiple identity providers.

João Rafael Almeida, André Zúquete, Alejandro Pazos, José Luís Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

João Rafael AlmeidaDETI/IEETA, LASI, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
André ZúqueteDETI/IEETA, LASI, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Alejandro PazosDepartment of Computation, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
José Luís OliveiraDETI/IEETA, LASI, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single Sign-On (SSO) methods are the primary solution to authenticate users across multiple web systems. These mechanisms streamline the authentication procedure by avoiding duplicate developments of authentication modules for each application. Besides, these mechanisms also provide convenience to the end-user by keeping the user authenticated when switching between different contexts. To ensure this cross-application authentication, SSO relies on an Identity Provider (IdP), which is commonly set up and managed by each institution that needs to enforce SSO internally. However, the solution is not so straightforward when several institutions need to cooperate in a unique ecosystem. This could be tackled by centralizing the authentication mechanisms in one of the involved entities, a solution raising responsibilities that may be difficult for peers to accept. Moreover, this solution is not appropriate for dynamic groups, where peers may join or leave frequently. In this paper, we propose an architecture that uses a trusted third-party service to authenticate multiple entities, ensuring the isolation of the user's attributes between this service and the institutional SSO systems. This architecture was validated in the EHDEN Portal, which includes web tools and services of this European health project, to establish a Federated Authentication schema.

Indexed as

ELIXIR AAIFederated authenticationIdPOAuth 2.0SSO

Identifiers

PMID38590890
PMCPMC10999912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.