Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590812›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2024

Climate change and health: rethinking public health messaging for wildfire smoke and extreme heat co-exposures.

Eric S Coker, Susan Lyon Stone, Erin McTigue, Jiayun Angela Yao, Emily P Brigham, Michael Schwandt, Sarah B Henderson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Public health guidance about wildfire smoke: Four targets for improvement.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric S CokerEnvironmental Health Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Susan Lyon StoneOffice of Air Quality Planning and Standards, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Erin McTigueAir and Radiation Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jiayun Angela YaoEnvironmental Health Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Emily P BrighamDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michael SchwandtOffice of the Chief Medical Health Officer, Vancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sarah B HendersonEnvironmental Health Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing climate change crisis, public health agencies and practitioners must increasingly develop guidance documents addressing the public health risks and protective measures associated with multi-hazard events. Our Policy and Practice Review aims to assess current public health guidance and related messaging about co-exposure to wildfire smoke and extreme heat and recommend strengthened messaging to better protect people from these climate-sensitive hazards. We reviewed public health messaging published by governmental agencies between January 2013 and May 2023 in Canada and the United States. Publicly available resources were eligible if they discussed the co-occurrence of wildfire smoke and extreme heat and mentioned personal interventions (protective measures) to prevent exposure to either hazard. We reviewed local, regional, and national governmental agency messaging resources, such as online fact sheets and guidance documents. We assessed these resources according to four public health messaging themes, including (1) discussions around vulnerable groups and risk factors, (2) symptoms associated with these exposures, (3) health risks of each exposure individually, and (4) health risks from combined exposure. Additionally, we conducted a detailed assessment of current messaging about measures to mitigate exposure. We found 15 online public-facing resources that provided health messaging about co-exposure; however, only one discussed all four themes. We identified 21 distinct protective measures mentioned across the 15 resources. There is considerable variability and inconsistency regarding the types and level of detail across described protective measures. Of the identified 21 protective measures, nine may protect against both hazards simultaneously, suggesting opportunities to emphasize these particular messages to address both hazards together. More precise, complete, and coordinated public health messaging would protect against climate-sensitive health outcomes attributable to wildfire smoke and extreme heat co-exposures.

Indexed as

Extreme HeatSmokeWildfiresClimate ChangeEnvironmental ExposureHumansPublic HealthUnited StatesSmokeclimate changeextreme eventsheatmessagingsmokewildfire

Identifiers

PMID38590812
PMCPMC10999651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.