Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590716›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Predictors of Toxicity in a Randomized Study of Consolidation Chemoradiation Versus Observation After First Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gall Bladder Cancers.

Sushma Agrawal, Anshika Gupta, Vishwas Kapoor, Rahul Rahul, Ashish Singh, Prabhakar Mishra, Rajan Saxena

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05493956 (A Randomised Study of Consolidation CTRT Versus Observation After First Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05493956 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised Study of Consolidation CTRT Versus Observation After First Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: RACE-GB Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesRan2019 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsGallbladder Cancer UnresectableArmschemoradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sushma AgrawalDepartments of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Anshika GuptaDepartments of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Vishwas KapoorBiostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Rahul RahulSurgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Ashish SinghSurgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Prabhakar MishraBiostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Rajan SaxenaSurgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity of Lucknow · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Gall bladder cancers (GBC) usually presents in advanced stage. First-line chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care, and there is no other option for responders than to wait for disease progression. We conducted a randomized study of consolidation chemoradiation (CTRT) versus observation in responders to first line CT (NCT05493956), which showed an improvement in overall survival by 6 months and therefore is practice changing. We are reporting the toxicity and factors predicting toxicity due to CTRT so that it informs appropriate patient selection. Methods and Materials: Responders to first line CT (partial response, stable disease) were randomized to CTRT versus observation after 4 cycles. CTRT was delivered by 3D conformal radiotherapy (along-with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m Results: Among 135 patients enrolled both arms are well balanced demographically, and 58% patients had T4 tumors, 42% had N2 and 15% had paraaortic lymph node, and 27% underwent upfront stenting. Grade 3 adverse events, such as anemia, dyspepsia, hepatotoxicity (Child Pugh B), and gastrointestinal bleed due to CTRT was observed in 9%, 1.5%, 13%, and 5.8%, respectively. Age >58 years ( Conclusions: Consolidation CTRT is tolerable in those with PTV1 volume less than 800 cc.

Identifiers

PMID38590716
PMCPMC10999813
OpenAlexW4391642714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.