Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2024

Exploring dermoscopic structures for melanoma lesions' classification.

Fiza Saeed Malik, Muhammad Haroon Yousaf, Hassan Ahmed Sial, Serestina Viriri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fiza Saeed MalikDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.
Muhammad Haroon YousafDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan.
Hassan Ahmed SialBarcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Serestina ViririSchool of Computing, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africa.
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ESUniversity of Engineering and Technology Taxila · PKUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of South Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Melanoma is one of the deadliest skin cancers that originate from melanocytes due to sun exposure, causing mutations. Early detection boosts the cure rate to 90%, but misclassification drops survival to 15-20%. Clinical variations challenge dermatologists in distinguishing benign nevi and melanomas. Current diagnostic methods, including visual analysis and dermoscopy, have limitations, emphasizing the need for Artificial Intelligence understanding in dermatology. Objectives: In this paper, we aim to explore dermoscopic structures for the classification of melanoma lesions. The training of AI models faces a challenge known as brittleness, where small changes in input images impact the classification. A study explored AI vulnerability in discerning melanoma from benign lesions using features of size, color, and shape. Tests with artificial and natural variations revealed a notable decline in accuracy, emphasizing the necessity for additional information, such as dermoscopic structures. Methodology: The study utilizes datasets with clinically marked dermoscopic images examined by expert clinicians. Transformers and CNN-based models are employed to classify these images based on dermoscopic structures. Classification results are validated using feature visualization. To assess model susceptibility to image variations, classifiers are evaluated on test sets with original, duplicated, and digitally modified images. Additionally, testing is done on ISIC 2016 images. The study focuses on three dermoscopic structures crucial for melanoma detection: Blue-white veil, dots/globules, and streaks. Results: In evaluating model performance, adding convolutions to Vision Transformers proves highly effective for achieving up to 98% accuracy. CNN architectures like VGG-16 and DenseNet-121 reach 50-60% accuracy, performing best with features other than dermoscopic structures. Vision Transformers without convolutions exhibit reduced accuracy on diverse test sets, revealing their brittleness. OpenAI Clip, a pre-trained model, consistently performs well across various test sets. To address brittleness, a mitigation method involving extensive data augmentation during training and 23 transformed duplicates during test time, sustains accuracy. Conclusions: This paper proposes a melanoma classification scheme utilizing three dermoscopic structures across Ph2 and Derm7pt datasets. The study addresses AI susceptibility to image variations. Despite a small dataset, future work suggests collecting more annotated datasets and automatic computation of dermoscopic structural features.

Indexed as

Derm7ptdermoscopic structuresmedical imagingmelanomaPH2Vision Transformers

Identifiers

PMID38590699
PMCPMC10999676
OpenAlexW4393152908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.