ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Study on the optimal elastic modulus of flexible blades for right heart assist device supporting patients with single-ventricle physiologies.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization in Adults with Fontan Circulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with single-ventricle physiologies continue to experience insufficient circulatory power after undergoing palliative surgeries. This paper proposed a right heart assist device equipped with flexible blades to provide circulatory assistance for these patients. The optimal elastic modulus of the flexible blades was investigated through numerical simulation. Methods: A one-way fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation was employed to study the deformation of flexible blades during rotation and its impact on device performance. The process began with a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation to calculate the blood pressure rise and the pressure on the blades' surface. Subsequently, these pressure data were exported for finite element analysis (FEA) to compute the deformation of the blades. The fluid domain was then recreated based on the deformed blades' shape. Iterative CFD and FEA simulations were performed until both the blood pressure rise and the blades' shape stabilized. The blood pressure rise, hemolysis risk, and thrombosis risk corresponding to blades with different elastic moduli were exhaustively evaluated to determine the optimal elastic modulus. Results: Except for the case at 8,000 rpm with a blade elastic modulus of 40 MPa, the pressure rise associated with flexible blades within the studied range (rotational speeds of 4,000 rpm and 8,000 rpm, elastic modulus between 10 MPa and 200 MPa) was lower than that of rigid blades. It was observed that the pressure rise corresponding to flexible blades increased as the elastic modulus increased. Additionally, no significant difference was found in the hemolysis risk and thrombus risk between flexible blades of various elastic moduli and rigid blades. Conclusion: Except for one specific case, deformation of the flexible blades within the studied range led to a decrease in the impeller's functionality. Notably, rotational speed had a more significant impact on hemolysis risk and thrombus risk compared to blade deformation. After a comprehensive analysis of blade compressibility, blood pressure rise, hemolysis risk, and thrombus risk, the optimal elastic modulus for the flexible blades was determined to be between 40 MPa and 50 MPa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.