ReviewCureus2024
A Review of Current Literature on Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Its Pathogenesis, Clinical Management, and Treatment.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Following Intradialytic Hypotension in End-Stage Renal Disease.Cureus · 2026Article
- Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Diagnosed via Ocular Point-of-care Ultrasound: Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Central Retinal Artery Occlusion in Acute Care: Current Practices and Emerging Therapies.Cureus · 2025Review
- Central retinal artery catheterization for retinal artery occlusion with balanced salt solution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced carotid ultrasound improves vulnerable plaque detection in acute central retinal artery occlusion: a propensity score-matched study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ocular analogue of a cerebral stroke is central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), a medical emergency concerning the eyes. Most patients experience substantial acute vision loss with a visual acuity of 20/400 or worse, resulting in decreased quality of life (QoL) and decreased functional ability. An impending cerebral stroke and ischemic heart disease are also more likely. The four distinct clinical entities that make up CRAO are non-arteritic CRAO, transitory non-arteritic CRAO, non-arteritic CRAO with cilioretinal artery sparing, and arteritic CRAO. Depending on the CRAO type, clinical traits, visual results, and treatment all vary greatly. Contrary to current belief, there is a spontaneous improvement in the optical field and vision, mainly in the first week. The likelihood of instinctive development in optical acuity in the first seven days varies greatly. The pathogenesis, epidemiology, and medical features of CRAO will be described in this review, along with present and potential management future options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.