ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications2024
DEFINING PATIENT PROFILES AFTER THE 2023 KAHRAMANMARAŞ, TURKEY EARTHQUAKE.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: On 6 February 2023, 2 earthquakes with magnitudes of 7.7 and 7.6 mW occurred in Pazarcık and Elbistan districts of Kahramanmaraş province (Turkey) and affected 11 provinces in total, especially Hatay, Malatya, and Adıyaman. Here, we report 3 earthquake victims in order to define patients profiles. Case reports: Three patients who were taken to the orthopedic and neurological rehabilitation program in our inpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation unit after the earthquake are presented. Our first case, a 46-year-old man, remain-ed in the debris for 8.5 h. His left leg was left in the wreckage, and he later developed a drop foot on the left due to compartment syndrome, which developed with pain and swelling in the left calf. There is no fasciotomy procedure. Venous Doppler was reported to be within normal limits. Our second case is a 52-year-old man who was in the debris for 36 h and has a left braxial plexus injury and a left drop foot. He has Buerger's disease in his medical history. The third case is an 8-year-old girl trapped in rubble during the earthquake with a right orbital fracture and a left foot transmetarsal amputation. She has no neurological signs. Discussion: The patients that apply to our Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic are especially amputees, patients with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve damage, plexus damage, multiple fractures, joint limitations and soft tissue loss in the musculoskeletal system. After the earthquake, we encountered patients from a wide variety of spectrums in our clinic. In addition to primary musculoskeletal injuries, they also experience systemic problems affecting the musculoskeletal system. Additionally, thrombosis, infection, renal failure, and multiple organ failures may also occur. Conclusion: Countries should develop guidelines for disaster preparedness and establish coordination units that can take quick action, make decisions, and communicate in times of disaster. A good definition of patient clinical profiles after the earthquake will ensure early intervention and prevent permanent disability and functional losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.