Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590404›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024

Intervention model under the Omaha system framework can effectively improve the sleep quality and negative emotion of patients with mid to late-stage lung cancer and is a protective factor for quality of life.

Ling Bai, Yu Shi, Shuru Zhou, Li Gong, Lili Zhang, Jiayi Tian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling BaiDepartment of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Yu ShiDepartment of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Shuru ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Li GongDepartment of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Lili ZhangDepartment of Emergency, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University No. 157 Xiwu Road, Xincheng District, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Jiayi TianDepartment of Nursing, Xi'an Innovation College of Yan'an University No. 2 Zaohe Road, Weiqu Street, Chang'an District, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effects of Omaha System framework interventions on quality of life, emotional well-being, and sleep quality in 507 mid to late-stage lung cancer patients. Retrospectively, we compared data of 294 patients receiving conventional care (conventional group) with 213 patients undergoing Omaha System interventions (intervention group) from January 2019 to January 2023. Key indicators included quality of life (FACT-L), anxiety (SAS), depression (SDS), sleep quality (PSQI), hope (HHS), and dignity (PDI). Post-intervention, the intervention group showed a significant increase in FACT-L scores (P<0.001), indicating enhanced quality of life. There was a notable reduction in PSQI scores (P<0.001), suggesting improved sleep quality. Additionally, their anxiety and depression levels significantly decreased, as evidenced by lower SAS (P<0.001) and SDS scores (P<0.001). Logistic regression revealed that care nursing intervention scheme (P=0.007), age (P=0.008), marital status (P=0.002), per capita monthly household income (P=0.004), SAS after intervention (P=0.002), and PSQI after intervention (P=0.002) had a positive influence on quality of life. In conclusion, the Omaha System interventions markedly improved the quality of life, emotional state, and sleep in lung cancer patients.

Indexed as

intervention modellung cancernegative emotionOmaha system frameworkquality of liferisk factorssleep quality

Identifiers

PMID38590404
PMCPMC10998752
OpenAlexW4393985151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.