Comparison of diagnostic criteria for sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in the pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: pRIFLE (Pediatric Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage Renal Disease), KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) and pROCK (Pediatric Reference Change Value Optimized for AKI) are diagnostic criteria used for acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence evaluation. The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic consistency, incidence and mortality rate, clinical signs, and influencing factors of renal injury related to sepsis in children diagnosed by three different AKI diagnostic criteria, and then evaluate which one was more valuable. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of children with severe sepsis. The patients were diagnosed and staged according to the 2007 pRIFLE standard, the 2012 KDIGO standard, and the 2018 pROCK standard. The clinical characteristics and prognosis of children with different stages of sepsis were compared between the three diagnostic standards. Results: A total of 62 patients with sepsis were included. Blood stream infection is common (11 cases, 17.74%). According to pRIFLE, KDIGO, and pROCK standards, the incidence of sepsis-associated AKI (SA-AKI) was 74.2%, 67.7%, and 56.5%, respectively. The pRIFLE had the highest diagnostic rate of early detection of SA-AKI. There was no statistical difference in SA-AKI incidence or staging consistency between the pRIFLE and KDIGO groups (κ=0.0671; κ>0.60); the consistency of SA-AKI diagnoses across the three standards was good (all P values <0.05), and pROCK demonstrated a higher specificity. A high Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score and high procalcitonin level were independent risk factors. Shock and renal replacement therapy were independent risk factors for SA-AKI death. Death from admission to 28 days after admission was used as an endpoint to draw a survival graph, which revealed that the AKI group had a significantly higher risk of death than did the non-AKI group. Conclusions: The consistency of diagnosing SA-AKI across the three classification criteria was similar, and mortality rate increased with increased SA-AKI staging. The pRIFLE criteria were more sensitive in the early detection of SA-AKI, while the pROCK had higher specificity. There was no significant difference between the pRIFLE and KDIGO in terms of incidence, diagnosis, or staging of SA-AKI.