Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590121›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2024

Type 2 vomeronasal receptor-A4 subfamily: Potential predator sensors in mice.

Andrea Rocha, Quynh Anh Thi Nguyen, Sachiko Haga-Yamanaka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea RochaNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Quynh Anh Thi NguyenNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Sachiko Haga-YamanakaNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4101-9889

Funding

Molecular and neural mechanisms of predator cue sensationR01DC019135 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI HAGA-YAMANAKA, SACHIKO · 2021 to 2025
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019135NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory signals detected by olfactory sensory organs are critical regulators of animal behavior. An accessory olfactory organ, the vomeronasal organ, detects cues from other animals and plays a pivotal role in intra- and inter-species interactions in mice. However, how ethologically relevant cues control mouse behavior through approximately 350 vomeronasal sensory receptor proteins largely remains elusive. The type 2 vomeronasal receptor-A4 (V2R-A4) subfamily members have been repeatedly detected from vomeronasal sensory neurons responsive to predator cues, suggesting a potential role of this receptor subfamily as a sensor for predators. This review focuses on this intriguing subfamily, delving into its receptor functions and genetic characteristics.

Indexed as

Olfactory BulbVomeronasal OrganAnimalsMiceSensory Receptor Cellsorganism; mammal, mouse, ratprocess; genetics, signalingtissue; olfactory organ, vomeronasal organ

Identifiers

PMID38590121
PMCPMC11018355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.