Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38590028›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2024

Multifeature quantitative motor assessment of upper limb ataxia including drawing and reaching.

Dominik Hermle, Robin Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Winfried Ilg, Rebecca Schüle, Ralf Reilmann, Matthis Synofzik, Andreas Traschütz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Digital Outcomes of Upper Limb Ataxia Capture Meaningful Longitudinal Change and Treatment Response.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomarkers in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dominik HermleDivision Translational Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Robin SchubertGeorge-Huntington-Institute, Münster, Germany.
Pascal BarallonGeorge-Huntington-Institute, Münster, Germany.
Winfried IlgSection Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany.
Rebecca SchüleGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany.
Ralf ReilmannGeorge-Huntington-Institute, Münster, Germany.
Matthis SynofzikDivision Translational Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-7273
Andreas TraschützDivision Translational Genomics of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8165-5898

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 01GM2209ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 441409627Else Kröner-Fresenius-StiftungUniversity of Tübingen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVoluntary upper limb movements are an ecologically important yet insufficiently explored digital-motor outcome domain for trials in degenerative ataxia. We extended and validated the trial-ready quantitative motor assessment battery "Q-Motor" for upper limb movements with clinician-reported, patient-focused, and performance outcomes of ataxia.

methodsExploratory single-center cross-sectional assessment in 94 subjects (46 cross-genotype ataxia patients; 48 matched controls), comprising five tasks measured by force transducer and/or position field: Finger Tapping, diadochokinesia, grip-lift, and-as novel implementations-Spiral Drawing, and Target Reaching. Digital-motor measures were selected if they discriminated from controls (AUC >0.7) and correlated-with at least one strong correlation (rho ≥0.6)-to the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA), activities of daily living (FARS-ADL), and the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT).

resultsSix movement features with 69 measures met selection criteria, including speed and variability in all tasks, stability in grip-lift, and efficiency in Target Reaching. The novel drawing/reaching tasks best captured impairment in dexterity (|rho

interpretationQ-Motor assessment captures multiple features of impaired upper limb movements in degenerative ataxia. Validation with key clinical outcome domains provides the basis for evaluation in longitudinal studies and clinical trial settings.

Indexed as

AtaxiaUpper ExtremityAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID38590028
PMCPMC11093241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.