ReviewCritical care (London, England)2024
Use of artificial intelligence in critical care: opportunities and obstacles.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in perioperative pressure injury management: a scoping review of evidence, gaps, and implications for population health and digital public health policy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems Among Health Care Workers: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Operationalization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Physicians' required competencies in AI-assisted clinical settings: a systematic review.British medical bulletin · 2025Pooled it
- Continuous renal replacement therapy attenuates endothelial injury biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: a prospective cohort study.Renal failure · 2026Observational
- Article
- Ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in medical education.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Physiology-guided mechanical ventilation: Monitoring, proportional assist, and bounded automation.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of deep vein thrombosis in elderly ICU patients: multicenter development and external validation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Radiomics in Oncology: Challenges, Limitations, and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Graph Network Feature Space Fusion for Predicting Irregularly Sampled Medical Time-Series Data: Deep Learning Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Do Multimodal Vision-Language Models Enhance the Medical Diagnostic Process? A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Early prognostication for ICU patients with combined respiratory and circulatory failure: an interpretable machine learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Technology use in pediatric cardiovascular surgery intensive care nursing: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Anaesthesia professionals' perspectives on ECG interpretation and arrhythmia situation awareness with Visual Patient Heart: a qualitative multicentre study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The Role of Explanations in AI-Generated Alerts: Qualitative Study of Clinical Views on Explainable AI in Predictive Tools.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate SEP-1 Measure Compliance and Fluid Management in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning for early prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multicenter retrospective development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The landscape of artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices in the EU and the US intended for intensive care units.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- It Is Time to Move Beyond Task-Specific Critical Care Prediction Models and Prioritize a Foundation Model Built on Continuous Physiological Data.Critical care medicine · 2026Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPerhaps nowhere else in the healthcare system than in the intensive care unit environment are the challenges to create useful models with direct time-critical clinical applications more relevant and the obstacles to achieving those goals more massive. Machine learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to define states and predict future events are commonplace activities of modern life. However, their penetration into acute care medicine has been slow, stuttering and uneven. Major obstacles to widespread effective application of AI approaches to the real-time care of the critically ill patient exist and need to be addressed. MAIN BODY: Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in acute and critical care environments support clinicians, not replace them at the bedside. As will be discussed in this review, the reasons are many and include the immaturity of AI-based systems to have situational awareness, the fundamental bias in many large databases that do not reflect the target population of patient being treated making fairness an important issue to address and technical barriers to the timely access to valid data and its display in a fashion useful for clinical workflow. The inherent "black-box" nature of many predictive algorithms and CDSS makes trustworthiness and acceptance by the medical community difficult. Logistically, collating and curating in real-time multidimensional data streams of various sources needed to inform the algorithms and ultimately display relevant clinical decisions support format that adapt to individual patient responses and signatures represent the efferent limb of these systems and is often ignored during initial validation efforts. Similarly, legal and commercial barriers to the access to many existing clinical databases limit studies to address fairness and generalizability of predictive models and management tools.
conclusionsAI-based CDSS are evolving and are here to stay. It is our obligation to be good shepherds of their use and further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.