ArticleGenome biology2024
A comprehensive benchmark of graph-based genetic variant genotyping algorithms on plant genomes for creating an accurate ensemble pipeline.
Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering structural variation in conifer gigagenomes: evolutionary insights and technical challenges.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- The Rise of Plant Pan-Genomes: From Genome Variation to Predictive Breeding.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Pangenome-based structural variant imputation enables large-scale genotype-phenotype studies in dairy cattle.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Graph-based pan-genome reveals structural and functional diversity across oil palm domestication gradients.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Challenges in Bringing Pangenome Research Into Breeding: A Case Study in Rice.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Phased-assembly-driven pangenome graphs for structural variant genotyping and complex trait mapping in dairy cattle.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Dynamics of genome evolution in the era of pangenome analysis.Cell genomics · 2026Review
- Genetic diversity analysis of sorghum grain traits and development of KASP markers for grain width genes SbTGW3 and SbGS5.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Pangenome analyses of tea plants reveal structural variations driving gene expression alterations and agronomic trait diversification.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Exploring cattle structural variation in the era of long reads, pangenome graphs, and near-complete assemblies.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive detection of structural variations in long and short reads dataset of French cattle.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The phased pan-genome of tetraploid European potato.Nature · 2025Article
- Review
- Pangenome analysis reveals structural variation associated with seed size and weight traits in peanut.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Graphical pangenomics-enabled characterization of structural variant impact on gene expression in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- SVLearn: a dual-reference machine learning approach enables accurate cross-species genotyping of structural variants.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Complexity welcome: Pangenome graphs for comprehensive population genomics.Quantitative plant biology · 2025Review
- A comprehensive benchmark of graph-based genetic variant genotyping algorithms on plant genomes for creating an accurate ensemble pipeline.Genome biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough sequencing technologies have boosted the measurement of the genomic diversity of plant crops, it remains challenging to accurately genotype millions of genetic variants, especially structural variations, with only short reads. In recent years, many graph-based variation genotyping methods have been developed to address this issue and tested for human genomes. However, their performance in plant genomes remains largely elusive. Furthermore, pipelines integrating the advantages of current genotyping methods might be required, considering the different complexity of plant genomes.
resultsHere we comprehensively evaluate eight such genotypers in different scenarios in terms of variant type and size, sequencing parameters, genomic context, and complexity, as well as graph size, using both simulated and real data sets from representative plant genomes. Our evaluation reveals that there are still great challenges to applying existing methods to plants, such as excessive repeats and variants or high resource consumption. Therefore, we propose a pipeline called Ensemble Variant Genotyper (EVG) that can achieve better genotyping performance in almost all experimental scenarios and comparably higher genotyping recall and precision even using 5× reads. Furthermore, we demonstrate that EVG is more robust with an increasing number of graphed genomes, especially for insertions and deletions.
conclusionsOur study will provide new insights into the development and application of graph-based genotyping algorithms. We conclude that EVG provides an accurate, unbiased, and cost-effective way for genotyping both small and large variations and will be potentially used in population-scale genotyping for large, repetitive, and heterozygous plant genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.