Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589877›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2024

Unveiling the hidden struggle of healthcare students as second victims through a systematic review.

José Joaquín Mira, Valerie Matarredona, Susanna Tella, Paulo Sousa, Vanessa Ribeiro Neves, Reinhard Strametz, Adriana López-Pineda

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06888297 (European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06888297 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

European Certification of Interventions in Support of Second Victims (RESCUE)

TypeobservationalSponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsSecond Victim Phenomenon, Occupational Stress, Healthcare Workforce Well-Being, Patient Safety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José Joaquín MiraAtenea Research. FISABIO, Alicante, Spain. jose.mira@umh.es.
Valerie MatarredonaAtenea Research. FISABIO, Alicante, Spain.
Susanna TellaFaculty of Health and Social Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lappeenranta, Finland.
Paulo SousaNOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
Vanessa Ribeiro NevesEscola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Reinhard StrametzWiesbaden Institute for Healthcare Economics and Patient Safety (WiHelP), RheinMain UAS, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Adriana López-PinedaUniversidad Miguel Hernández, Elche, Spain.

Funding

COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) www.cost.eu. COST ACTION 19113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen healthcare students witness, engage in, or are involved in an adverse event, it often leads to a second victim experience, impacting their mental well-being and influencing their future professional practice. This study aimed to describe the efforts, methods, and outcomes of interventions to help students in healthcare disciplines cope with the emotional experience of being involved in or witnessing a mistake causing harm to a patient during their clerkships or training.

methodsThis systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and includes the synthesis of eighteen studies, published in diverse languages from 2011 to 2023, identified from the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and APS PsycInfo. PICO method was used for constructing a research question and formulating eligibility criteria. The selection process was conducted through Rayyan. Titles and abstracts of were independently screened by two authors. The critical appraisal tools of the Joanna Briggs Institute was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies.

resultsA total of 1354 studies were retrieved, 18 met the eligibility criteria. Most studies were conducted in the USA. Various educational interventions along with learning how to prevent mistakes, and resilience training were described. In some cases, this experience contributed to the student personal growth. Psychological support in the aftermath of adverse events was scattered.

conclusionEnsuring healthcare students' resilience should be a fundamental part of their training. Interventions to train them to address the second victim phenomenon during their clerkships are scarce, scattered, and do not yield conclusive results on identifying what is most effective and what is not.

Indexed as

Medical ErrorsAdaptation, PsychologicalClinical ClerkshipHumansStudents, Health OccupationsStudents, MedicalAdverse eventsPatient safetyResilienceSecond victimsStudents

Identifiers

PMID38589877
PMCPMC11000311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.