Trial reportBMC cancer2024
A phase II/III randomized clinical trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative chemotherapy versus immediate resection in patIents with resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at high risk for recurrence: PURITY study.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06037980 (A Phase II/III Randomized Clinical Trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II/III Randomized Clinical Trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative Chemotherapy Versus Immediate Resection in patIents With resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at High Risk for Recurrence: PURITY Study
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neoadjuvant immuno-chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy for patients with resectable high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and excellent performance status: interim efficacy results from the ZSAB-neoGOLP trial.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Anatomic-Biologic Borderline Resectability Criteria Improve Recurrence Risk Stratification in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Perioperative approaches for patients with biliary tract cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Conversion to Resection After Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and Nab-Paclitaxel for Borderline Resectable CCA: A Real-World Exploratory Analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Oncological Resectability Criteria for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Preoperative Framework for Multidisciplinary Management.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Current knowledge about immunotherapy response after liver transplantation of patients with liver cancer.Journal of liver transplantation · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes in Resected Biliary Tract Cancers: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.Cancers · 2025Article
- Predicting cisplatin response in cholangiocarcinoma patients using chromosome pattern and related gene expression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Surgical Wisdom in the Artificial Intelligence Era: Predicting Futility in Gallbladder Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Revisiting resectability of biliary tract cancers, in the triplet drug therapy era with immune checkpoint inhibitors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
37 authors at 19 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and lethal cancers, with a 5-year survival inferior to 20%(1-3). The only potential curative treatment is surgical resection. However, despite complex surgical procedures that have a remarkable risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, the 5-year survival rate after radical surgery (R0) is 20-40% and recurrence rates are up to ~ 75%(4-6). Up to ~ 40% of patients relapse within 12 months after resection, and half of these patient will recur systemically(4-6). There is no standard of care for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable BTC, but retrospective reports suggest its potential benefit (7, 8).
methodsPURITY is a no-profit, multicentre, randomized phase II/III trial aimed at evaluating the efficacy of the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence. Primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant GAP followed by surgery as compared to upfront surgery, in terms of 12-month progression-free survival for the phase II part and of progression free survival (PFS) for the phase III study. Key Secondary objectives are event free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival, (RFS), overall survival (OS), R0/R1/R2 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), overall response rate (ORR), resectability. Safety analyses will include toxicity rate and perioperative morbidity and mortality rate. Exploratory studies including Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in archival tumor tissues and longitudinal ctDNA analysis are planned to identify potential biomarkers of primary resistance and prognosis. DISCUSSION: Considering the poor prognosis of resected BTC experiencing early tumor recurrence and the negative prognostic impact of R1/R2 resections, PURITY study is based on the rationale that NAC may improve R0 resection rates and ultimately patients' outcomes. Furthermore, NAC should allow early eradication of microscopic distant metastases, undetectable by imaging but already present at the time of diagnosis and avoid mortality and morbidity associated with resection for patients with rapid progression or worsening general condition during neoadjuvant therapy. The randomized PURITY study will evaluate whether patients affected by BTC at high risk from recurrence benefit from a neoadjuvant therapy with GAP regimen as compared to immediate surgery.
trial registrationPURITY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06037980) and EuCT(2023-503295-25-00).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.