ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2024
Artificial Intelligence for Clinically Meaningful Outcome Prediction in Orthopedic Research: Current Applications and Limitations.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning in the development and application of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for surgical patients: a systematic review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Biological Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment: An International Consensus Symposium.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy of 3D-printed bone graft container in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures and postoperative rehabilitation prediction model.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and its Current Role in Clinical Outcome Prediction, Musculoskeletal Imaging, and Economic and Ethical Considerations within Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- GPT-4 outperforms junior expert physical therapists in sports medicine rehabilitation: an evaluation of AI response quality and adaptiveness.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting rehabilitation non-response after knee arthroplasty.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Integrated strategies in meniscus tissue engineering: from biomaterials to stem cell-driven regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Some artificial intelligence tools may currently be useful in orthopedic surgery and traumatology.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Developing a Prototype Machine Learning Model to Predict Quality of Life Measures in People Living With HIV.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2025Article
- Leveraging digital twins for improved orthopaedic evaluation and treatment.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Predicting Nonidiopathic Scoliosis from Plain Radiographs: A Deep-Learning Approach.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPatient-reported outcome measures (PROM) play a critical role in evaluating the success of treatment interventions for musculoskeletal conditions. However, predicting which patients will benefit from treatment interventions is complex and influenced by a multitude of factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) may better anticipate the propensity to achieve clinically meaningful outcomes through leveraging complex predictive analytics that allow for personalized medicine. This article provides a contemporary review of current applications of AI developed to predict clinically significant outcome (CSO) achievement after musculoskeletal treatment interventions. RECENT
findingsThe highest volume of literature exists in the subspecialties of total joint arthroplasty, spine, and sports medicine, with only three studies identified in the remaining orthopedic subspecialties combined. Performance is widely variable across models, with most studies only reporting discrimination as a performance metric. Given the complexity inherent in predictive modeling for this task, including data availability, data handling, model architecture, and outcome selection, studies vary widely in their methodology and results. Importantly, the majority of studies have not been externally validated or demonstrate important methodological limitations, precluding their implementation into clinical settings. A substantial body of literature has accumulated demonstrating variable internal validity, limited scope, and low potential for clinical deployment. The majority of studies attempt to predict the MCID-the lowest bar of clinical achievement. Though a small proportion of models demonstrate promise and highlight the utility of AI, important methodological limitations need to be addressed moving forward to leverage AI-based applications for clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.