Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589643›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2024

Congenital anomalies during Covid-19: artifact of surveillance or a real TORCH?

Nathalie Auger, Laura Arbour, Antoine Lewin, Émilie Brousseau, Jessica Healy-Profitós, Thuy Mai Luu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathalie AugerUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. nathalie.auger@inspq.qc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2412-0459
Laura ArbourDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Antoine LewinMedical Affairs and Innovation, Hema-Quebec, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Émilie BrousseauUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jessica Healy-ProfitósUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Thuy Mai LuuDepartment of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Centre, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR PUU-177957Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 296785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections in the first trimester of pregnancy can be teratogenic, but the possibility that Covid-19 could lead to birth defects is unclear. We examined whether SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy or exposure to pandemic conditions were associated with the risk of congenital anomalies. We carried out a retrospective study of 420,222 neonates born in Quebec, Canada in two time periods: prepandemic (January 1, 2017 to March 12, 2020) vs. pandemic (March 13, 2020 to March 31, 2022). We classified pandemic births as early (first trimester completed before the pandemic) or late (first trimester during the pandemic), and identified patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections during pregnancy. We applied (1) adjusted log-binomial regression models to assess the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and congenital anomalies, and (2) autoregressive interrupted time series regression to analyze temporal trends in the monthly number of defects in all patients regardless of infection. In total, 29,263 newborns (7.0%) had a congenital anomaly. First trimester SARS-CoV-2 infections were not associated with a greater risk of birth defects compared with no infection (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.59-1.95). However, births during the late pandemic period were more likely to be diagnosed with congenital microcephaly compared with prepandemic births (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21-1.71). Interrupted time series analysis confirmed that the frequency of microcephaly increased during the late pandemic period, whereas other anomalies did not. We conclude that Covid-19 is likely not teratogenic, but enhanced surveillance of anomalies among late pandemic births may have heightened the detection of infants with microcephaly.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesCOVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousSARS-CoV-2AdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePandemicsPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstQuebecRetrospective StudiesBirth defectsCovid-19Epidemiologic surveillanceMicrocephalyPregnancy trimestersSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.