Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589641›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Prediction model for anabolic androgenic steroid positivity in forensic autopsy cases - a new tool to the autopsy room.

Paula Vauhkonen, Petteri Oura, Pirkko Kriikku, Katarina Lindroos, Mikko Ilari Mäyränpää

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula VauhkonenForensic Medicine Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland. paula.vauhkonen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-4999
Petteri OuraForensic Medicine Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirkko KriikkuDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, P.O. Box 21, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Katarina LindroosForensic Medicine Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikko Ilari MäyränpääDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, P.O. Box 21, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö 4705793 / SLS HelCaVa Mäyränpää 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-prescription use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) is associated with an increased risk of premature death. However, these substances are seldom screened in connection with forensic cause-of-death investigation, unless the forensic pathologist specifically suspects use, often based on a positive AAS use history. Since AAS use is often concealed from others, this practice may lead to mistargeting of these analyses and significant underestimation of the true number of AAS positive cases undergoing forensic autopsy. Thus, more accurate diagnostic tools are needed to identify these cases. The main objective of this study was to determine, whether a multivariable model could predict AAS urine assay positivity in forensic autopsies. We analyzed retrospectively the autopsy reports of all cases that had been screened for AAS during forensic cause-of-death investigation between 2016-2019 at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare forensic units (n = 46). Binary logistic regression with penalized maximum likelihood estimation was used to generate a nine-variable model combining circumferential and macroscopic autopsy-derived variables. The multivariable model predicted AAS assay positivity significantly better than a "conventional" model with anamnestic information about AAS use only (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.968 vs. 0.802, p = 0.005). Temporal validation was conducted in an independent sample of AAS screened cases between 2020-2022 (n = 31), where the superiority of the multivariable model was replicated (AUC = 0.856 vs. 0.644, p = 0.004). Based on the model, a calculator predicting AAS assay positivity is released as a decision-aiding tool for forensic pathologists working in the autopsy room.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsAutopsySubstance Abuse DetectionAdultAnabolic Androgenic SteroidsAndrogensFemaleFinlandHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveYoung AdultAnabolic AgentsAnabolic Androgenic SteroidsAndrogensAnabolic androgenic steroidsForensic autopsyPost-mortem toxicologyPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID38589641
PMCPMC11306540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.