Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38589387›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Unveiling blood donation knowledge, attitude, and practices among 12,606 university students: a cross-sectional study across 16 countries.

Nael Kamel Eltewacy, Hossam Tharwat Ali, Tarek A Owais, Souad Alkanj, EARG Collaborators, Mahmoud A Ebada

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 20 institutions in 18 countries.

Nael Kamel Eltewacy *École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hossam Tharwat Ali *Eltewacy Arab Research Group (EARG), Cairo, Egypt.
Tarek A OwaisEltewacy Arab Research Group (EARG), Cairo, Egypt.
Souad AlkanjFaculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, El-Sharkia, Egypt.
EARG Collaborators
Mahmoud A Ebada *Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, El-Sharkia, Egypt. mahmoud011467@medicine.zu.edu.eg.ORCID 0000-0001-5284-2929
University of Cape Coast · GHCairo University · EGHashemite University · JOShadan Hospital and Institute of Medical Sciences · INMohammed V University · MAAlzaiem Alazhari University · SDSulaiman Al Rajhi Colleges · SAZagazig University · EGAl-Azhar University – Gaza · PSBadji Mokhtar-Annaba University · DZBezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi · TRKarachi Medical and Dental College · PKLatakia University · SYMansoura University · EGSana'a University · YESouth Valley University · EGTaif University · SATanta University · EGThamar University · YEUniversity Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed university students' knowledge, attitude, and practice toward blood donation and identified the factors that promote or hinder their willingness to donate. We employed a multicenter cross-sectional design, collecting data from August to October 2022 through self-administered questionnaires available in Arabic and English. Both online (Google Forms) and paper surveys were utilized. Data were analyzed using R Statistical Software (v4.1.3; R Core Team 2022). A total of 12,606 university students (7966 females and 4640 males) from 16 countries completed the questionnaire; of them, 28.5% had a good knowledge level regarding blood donation, and 22.7% had donated blood at least once. Students in health science colleges had significantly more awareness of blood donation (p-value < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in practice (p-value = 0.8). Barriers to donation included not being asked (37%), medical ineligibility (33%), fear of pain or infection (18%), concerns about negative health effects (18%), difficulty accessing donation centers (15%), and medical mistrust (14%). Individuals aged > 20 years had significantly higher odds of possessing a high knowledge level (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.77, p < 0.001). Private and international university enrollment was associated with increased knowledge (aOR 1.19, p-value < 0.001 and aOR 1.44, p-value = 0.003), while non-health science college students had lower odds (aOR 0.36, p < 0.001). Regarding blood donation status, participants > 20 years old were more likely to donate (aOR 2.21, p < 0.001). Conversely, being female, having congenital or chronic diseases, and possessing low knowledge levels were associated with decreased odds of blood donation (all p < 0.05). University students show insufficient knowledge about blood donation, with health science students displaying higher awareness levels. Despite their positive attitudes, blood donation rates remain low across all disciplines. It is imperative to enhance education and accessibility to foster a culture of blood donation among students.

Indexed as

Blood DonationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustUniversitiesYoung AdultBlood donationCross-sectional studyMultinationalUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID38589387
PMCPMC11001850
OpenAlexW4394579210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.